TED Conversations

Sebastian Villegas

This conversation is closed.

Human Development vs Economic Development

If you could have the control of any average country, which area would you inclined to upgrade, and why?


Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

  • Apr 3 2014: Sebastian

    An interesting proposition. If I were a god with a godly wisdom, the educational system would be my choice. The indoctrination of young malleable minds is to control the future of a nation, from the bedroom, to the work place, to all aspects of the society. “The education of all children, from the moment that they can get along without a mother's care, shall be in state institutions.” Karl Marx

    To control the education of the child is not simply a control of the now or the control of a society, it is a control of the past. It is to rewrite, relearn that, which may conflict with greater plans for expansion of the educational process. "Two plus two is five." Truth becomes subversive and history is only that, which serves to advance the future. As teacher it is I, then, that defines and gives definition
    "Power is in tearing human minds to pieces and putting them together again in new shapes of your own choosing.”
    ― George Orwell, 1984

    “It has been said that arguing against globalization is like arguing against the laws of gravity." Kofi Annan
    Education then is my choice, as one nation has no value if it is the world I want and why should I stop with just one country when I am right and the cause is right and right is by my definition.

    One nation then serves only to raise and educate those thought warriors that now advance across into the lands of neighboring countries. Their purpose, their objective is to demoralize and divide, to promise a peace of love, kindness and openness, a tolerance to and for all things, void of a false past, a false history and culture that exploited and enslaved the innocent. A past that with the expectation of individual responsibility encroached and intruded into the personal lives of its people, not allowing a free expression of desire and self fulfillment.
    “He who controls the past controls the future. He who controls the present controls the past.”
    George Orwell, 1984
    • thumb
      Apr 6 2014: Good job guy! actually when you use the marx theories with different proposals and solution, you should get more balance on the human development. dosent have to be like URSS example and others examples that had been losing the meaning of real human develpment. the anarchism is the way but first prepared the culturar thinking of the people

      give me like if you agree with me and defense this cause
      • Apr 6 2014: Sebastian

        Thank you for the accolade, but it was a fairly easy scenario to build. I simply turned over my judgement to base emotions ie. greed, the quest for power over the lives of others, promiscuity or whatever base instincts one might possess. Totalitarian is a good word, King, Pharaoh, Lord, God are the words that guided me to outline the current situation in the Western world and guess what; I won the prize.
        No, Sebastian I am not an anarchist, nor a Marxist Socialist. I am an American and to be an American, one endorses the concept of individual freedom, predicated on limited government. Its an antiquated political philosophy that the USA was founded on. It was a grand experiment, but, as it was said, that it would happen; when the people realized that they could vote themselves money, the republic would end.
        I know what anarchism is, but just for conversation, how would you go about achieving it? Much the same way as I outlined above, employing deceit and other things. Perhaps, it would be in line with, 'If you like your Doctor you can keep him" You may not know the reference, but it is fitting.
        Philosophically speaking anarchism requires a much higher degree of evolution then we now possess and to achieve such a state human, with all our faults could not exist. I don't think this is a concern, as it is the promise of a utopia that is the attraction to many, as socialism is now. But for all such altruistic philosophies it is not the end result, it is the struggle.
        I am open to correction if you would care to engage in such a dialogue.

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.