TED Conversations

This conversation is closed.

Should the US convene a new Constitutional Convention to hammer out the US Constitution, Version 2? How could we make it better?

The US Constitution is an amazing piece of work, but let's face it there are some ambiguities, outdated concepts, and missing (perhaps) parts. the Supreme Court and Congress daily interpret and abide but seldom actually change or update the original codicil. The current issues of privacy with the NSA spying and out of control gun violence, proselytizing in the military and a host of other news stories of late suggest it may be time for an overhaul of the original Constitution.
Is it time to convene a second Constitutional convention to clarify, edit and update or would the task prove impossible? Perhaps the task is too risky or simply beyond our reach. Maybe the original is as good as it gets.


Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

  • thumb
    Dec 20 2013: Actually I think Americans get glazed wistful eyes when you mention the founding fathers.If I were to quote what an old guy said 200 years ago in a UK court, I would be laughed out of court in the UK. Definitely think, a country based on what some cowboys said two hundred years ago, definitely needs to take a second look. However, that would be like going to Iran and burning the Qur'an for the average gun toting Christian conservative American.

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.