Blaise Jabo

This conversation is closed.

one's thinking

One’s thinking
What you are thinking, I am thinking of it, or I have already thought of it and I might be about to think of it. Thinking is regarded as something from a personal perspective, argued to be unique, and of intelligent background. But I think as one might as well think too, that (thinking) is just as common as anything else, created around an environment that will give that thought a meaning, same way we cry at funerals instead of smiling/laughing, the environment will play a big role in whatever we are thinking, it stimulates us to think. So if two individuals are exposed in same environment there is a big chance for them to think about things in an almost same fashion, however it’s the application and presentation of the thought by individuals that makes the thought look different when it comes to the outside. Thinking comes from within us, the environment triggers us to communicate with it in thought; we create thought, shape it, weight it and give it a time-scale. The thought might be of the same to two individuals, but the shaping of the thought, the weight and its timing might be very different which in result appear as if the two individuals had different thought in the first place

  • thumb
    Nov 12 2013: During the period of time leading up to our evolution to the species, homo sapiens, we may not have had complex thoughts beyond our basic urges to survive and procreate. No doubt we had developed an inclination toward community, but likely communicated through gestures; language itself was probably of a low order and limited to grunts and gesticulations.

    The banding together of the earliest 'people' would require the development of a rudimentary 'vocabulary', a common language. Members of even the earliest surviving groups would develop means to communicate with each other, and would work for the common good of the band; specifically, for it's well-being and survival. An awareness individual well-being based on the common purpose of the group would, through time, become inherent.

    As individuals within groups displayed specific abilities which increased the safety or the well-being of the group, they would undoubtedly assume positions of increased responsibility, and their ideas, their thoughts, would likely be adopted by the group. Their thinking would set them apart from the general mass, as long as it benefited the whole. The basic credo, however, would remain the betterment, or the status quo, of the group.

    A code of behaviour would develop, directed toward sustaining and improving the group's well-being. Individual thinking would be welcomed if it supported the group, and the willingness to accept new ideas would increase as new ideas proved successful. Eventually, the continued success of new ideas would tip the scales to the point where creative thinking was encouraged and rewarded, and old ideas would slowly be replaced.

    Although there are "...more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."*, the maintenance of the status quo seems to be our guiding principle, and while new insights are widely offered and considered, our individual and group thoughts, much like those early bands of nomads, remain unchanged. *Hamlet
    • thumb
      Nov 12 2013: this is a really good point of view about this topic. Thanks a lot for your insights.
  • Nov 12 2013: Hi dear Blaise Jabo,thinking keeps me peaceful to deal things around.Thinking reminds me my brain working,and as much as I keep doing so,my brain wouldn't be atrophied as fast as time goes by...and I would like to be full of wits when I am an old granny:)LOL.By the way,would you like come to share your opinions about Rene Descartes' words:I think ,therefore I am.Thank you.
    • thumb
      Nov 12 2013: yeah thanks, i would love to share my opinions on that.. let me know when and how.
      • Nov 13 2013: Hi Dear Blaise Jabo,could you share your opinions about'I think,therefore I am' here?you can offer 2000 characters for every comments.And the topic will last one month.Please just come to share in free?Because since a few years ago,I read Rene Descartes' words:'I think,therefore I am' in English.I suddenly thought of my learning about it in Chinese.I was supposed it was totally wrong understanding of Descartes these words.I think it caused by wrong translation or wrong explanation in Chinese about it.So I would like to hear as many as I can meet those friends who like to come to talk about it in English.It can help me to boost my conciousness of thinking.Thank you!
  • Nov 12 2013: I have thought like this. The thought is identical to yours. Maybe thoughts don't come from our-self but from everyone collectively. How would you prove that scientifically?
  • Nov 11 2013: Our minds speak the same language, even for those who believe their idea had been stolen, not really, sometimes we think the same thing in different perspective. Sorry for my English guys.
  • Nov 11 2013: I have over 300 links directly related to this very topic. Filtered lists can be provided upon request pertaining to specific fields or aspects of relevance.

    Synchronized Brains: Feeling Strong Emotions Makes People's Brains 'Tick Together'
    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/05/120524112342.htm
    Tense Film Scenes Trigger Brain Activity
    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/06/120614131204.htm
    Many Maps of the Brain
    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/12/121205132244.htm
    New Genes Linked to Brain Size, Intelligence
    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/04/120415150123.htm
    Dopamine Impacts Your Willingness to Work
    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/05/120501182755.htm
    Brains Wired for 'Avalanches' -- And Learning
    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/05/120502112935.htm
    How Social Interaction and Teamwork Led to Human Intelligence
    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/04/120419132556.htm
    How Stress and Depression Can Shrink the Brain
    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/08/120812151659.htm
    Hippocampus: Mapping or memory?
    http://www.cell.com/current-biology/retrieve/pii/S0960982200007636
    Spatial Memory and Hippocampal Function: Where are we now?
    http://www.uv.es/psicologica/articulos1.02/M6Good.pdf
    Human Brain, Internet, and Cosmology: Similar Laws at Work?
    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/11/121119140545.htm
    Optogenetics
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optogenetics
    Music semiology
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Music_semiology
    Semiotics
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semiotics#Main_institutions
    Toward a Universal Law of Generalization for Psychological Science
    http://k7moa.com/Shepard_1987.pdf
    Semiotics of Thinking
    http://www.neurosemiotics.com/docs/Semiotics_of_Thinking.pdf
    Do animals feel empathy?
    http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=do-animals-feel-empathy
    Emotional responses to music: The need to consider underlying mechanisms
    http://nemcog.smusic.nyu.edu/docs/JuslinBBSTargetArticle.pdf

    I know... lol.
    • thumb
      Nov 11 2013: hahaaa quite a list isn't it . but give me some thoughts from what u think of it...thanks for the list