TED Conversations

This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »

If we accept that nature is the only fundamental regulation, is the process of creativity or originality a paradox?

If we accept that nature is the only fundamental regulation, is the process of creativity or originality a paradox?

Is there any such thing as an original thought or action? considering that everything we do operates within the confines of nature. Does this make anything that we do just a reaction? If you accept that the universe is infinite, then surely there was never a point of origin. If you believe that the universe has an origin or a set point in which it was created, then surely everything else is just a reaction. Either way, the term creativity as we use it today must be redundant?

Can anyone clarify this for me?

Sincerely

Craig Mallis

+1
Share:

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

  • thumb
    Sep 27 2013: If we can accept that nature is a state of being that has emerged from no-thing by mere evolutionary process of elimination of the less probable, natural laws as descendants of that process and everything is a result of recombination of the elements of the initial configuration, there is neither creation nor originality and hence no paradox.

    Even at the abstract level, originality is a moot point.

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.