TED Conversations

This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »

What's more beneficial: Revolution or Evolution?

All of us had seen the so called Egyptian revolution on our TV channels, whom Karl Marx would, without wasting a fraction of second, recall as ideological state apparatuses trying to perpetuate the ruling class's point of view. But how many of us actually had thought over the need for revolution? Revolution, Revolution and Revolution is always talked about but the reason, the real one, is never debated. The Egyptian revolution geared by social media hypes ended up not different than a social media debate which pretty much clarifies the wrongly perpetuated need for a revolution. Turn the page, and think over evolution. Isn't evolution what we need? Is this the age of revolution or evolution? It's not 1789, it's modernly-trimmed society of 2013. do they need revolution? will they accept revolution? With media at hands, as Marx calls it, won't the ruling class turn the revolution toward its hidden goals?

+3
Share:

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

  • thumb
    Oct 13 2013: That view about bourgeoisie,is little tricky. Top layers has information monopoly,and information is something that make them always one step forward. So they are making artificial "revolutions", and placement of wrong information, just to keep folks stay peacefully, so they can control them.

    Is that real revolution? Every era has had some of the rulers who have used some dirty tricks, just to stay longer on top.

    Nowdays, we know about spying of society networks,and we know every step we take is predictable (because information are 'available') and it is hard to realize REAL revolution.

    So, there is difference between their and ours revolution.
    Our revolution needs more time, worn tolerance, repressed anger....but that energy couldn't be stopped by bombs,police, drubbing...nothing :)
    • thumb
      Oct 13 2013: I am not saying they are making 'artificial revolution', actually they are converting the uproar of real revolution into an artificial one. The base is pure but the cement of edifice is artificial.
      Before asking 'is that revolution', we would need to define which revolution are we talking about? Marxists revolution?
      So, the revolution is on evolutionary stages. right?

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.