TED Conversations

This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »

What's more beneficial: Revolution or Evolution?

All of us had seen the so called Egyptian revolution on our TV channels, whom Karl Marx would, without wasting a fraction of second, recall as ideological state apparatuses trying to perpetuate the ruling class's point of view. But how many of us actually had thought over the need for revolution? Revolution, Revolution and Revolution is always talked about but the reason, the real one, is never debated. The Egyptian revolution geared by social media hypes ended up not different than a social media debate which pretty much clarifies the wrongly perpetuated need for a revolution. Turn the page, and think over evolution. Isn't evolution what we need? Is this the age of revolution or evolution? It's not 1789, it's modernly-trimmed society of 2013. do they need revolution? will they accept revolution? With media at hands, as Marx calls it, won't the ruling class turn the revolution toward its hidden goals?


Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

  • Sep 24 2013: Revolution as it is in the Egypt was needed but after a year with the elected government some actors of the world's political arena has found out that the elected govt contradicts with their intrests. So they got Mubarak out of prison and Morsi in. This is the end of the Revolution, which is something harsh and sudden. Unles revolution proves anything in Egypt, Evolution proves nothing either, which is slow and feeble.
    • thumb
      Sep 26 2013: Just turn the page and see it through different perspectives. If it had been the real revolution then it wouldn't have been the way it is, a year is a much of time to topple over things and that gap either shows the weak edifice of revolution, if you continue to argue, or that there had been no real motive behind the revolution at the first place.

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.