TED Conversations

This conversation is closed.

Is a purely logical debate possible?

Is it possible to have a debate with absolutely no emotion and using only logic? I cant imagine it being possible because even if you craft a perfectly logical argument and remove your own emotion your listeners will still receive and analyze it in light of their own emotions. As a subquestion what emotions do you think predominate debate? I would say anger and fear. Would it be possible to change that? I'm thinking of this especially in light of persuasive debate, when you want someone to do something for you.

Share:

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

  • thumb
    Sep 10 2013: the analytical logic of us depends on our pertinence to find the final goal and the first principals of our sens perceptions ,and like we can't be deporved from our sensations ,the purely logical debate depends on the time that we live it ,the long we can be purely logic with same principals the most we belong to this principals like intolerence ,the most we can percept our intolerence the long our ethical critic can be close to the truth that we need to know.

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.