TED Conversations

Lindsay Newland Bowker

TEDCRED 50+

This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »

What are the limits of sovereignty? Are we clear on international norms?

Present debate on what to do about Syrias use of chemical weapons on rebels/government opponents takes us back to the broader issue of the limits of sovereignty. It seems apparent that we don't have shared global values on a country's interior use of chemical weapons or what to do about it even though this ostensibly has been a matter of global consensus since the end of World War II. .What action is justified and is it ok for anyone nation to act alone without a global consensus on the basis of "protecting its national interests"?

(I will add links to several TED convesrations we have had in the past on global values and global governance)

0
Share:

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

  • Sep 9 2013: The only limit on national sovereignty is the power of other sovereigns or entities with quasi-sovereign power (international corporations). Any other claim is nothing but a naive fantasy.
    • thumb
      Sep 9 2013: that is "what is" no question there.
    • Sep 12 2013: Bryan,
      Commerce,
      Corporations and Limited Liability, Lobbies,
      The Corporate structure. Congress on steroids.
      Good ole' boy club-mates. aka: Regulators.
      Power. A strange word. Think about it. Really.

      1800's
      Individual Sovereignty is passed by your vote to
      some snake oil salesman, a guy on a soap-box.
      1900's
      Well entrenched Politicians carve up the nation.
      Bureau of Land Management and Banking Cartels
      take charge. Individual Sovereignty is stolen.
      2000's
      Your vote, now a sham, Propaganda from a
      Controlled media rules this nation's selections.
      Polls are the dot for the "I".
      ...The cross for the "T"?
      DNI, CIA, NSA, DHS, FBI,
      Enforcement not Privacy...

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.