TED Conversations

Nelson Hyde Chick

This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »

Preventing those that would be bad parents from becoming parents

Take a survey of our thousand most successful people about the parenting they received as children; then compare those experiences with the parenting received from our thousand worst criminals. The successful people will tell stories mostly of decent to great parenting, while the criminals will be telling stories about abandonment, abuse and neglect. Also, all those stories we read about people that were about to overcome the obstacles of poverty to go on to do great thing, they all had some good parenting in their past. Society’s worst problem is bad parenting.

+1
Share:

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

  • thumb
    Jul 14 2013: In the United States (and most other western countries), procreation is recognized as one of the fundamental freedoms. 'Preventing' someone from becoming a parent is not the answer.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_rights
    • thumb
      Jul 15 2013: Sure it is the answer, if say they have a felony conviction that victomized a child.
      • thumb
        Jul 15 2013: Which part of 'procreation is a fundamental right' are you failing to understand? No law or court can stop anyone who wishes to from becoming a parent. no matter what their past.
        • thumb
          Jul 15 2013: And I am saying maybe a child should have a right not to be born to someone who has proven themselves to be shit fot a parent!
        • thumb
          Jul 15 2013: Here is a possible solution, Lawren: A man is convicted of a felony, and the conviction is thrown out because he agrees to get a vasectomy. This would reduce the people currently in prison, and thus save us money now, while helping reduce future prison populations, and saving us money down the road. We could give the felon the option of freezing some of his swimmers, and then if he turns his life around he can start a family; this would reduce unplanned pregnancies, lower abortion operations and lower welfare customers. Theoretically it could even produce healthier children: As we age we are bombarded by radiation, and this is why the children conceived from the sperm of a twenty year old man is going to be healthier than the sperm from that same man when he is forty. A man in his twenties commits a felony, is convicted, and he gets a pass because he got a vasectomy. He turns his life around and decides he wants to have a child when he is forty, but he uses his sperm frozen when he was twenty, the child more likely than not will be healthier than if he had just used his forty year old sperm.

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.