TED Conversations

This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »

Is cancer a consequence of an unbalanced muscular growing?

Fat is a source of energy. Sugar is also a source of energy. Proteins, vitamins and minerals are essential for our life and we get most of them from our diet; we get most of our proteins from the meat that we consume. Some of the proteins are created by the body itself. In-situ proteins are created by condensation of amino acids under the influence of enzyme catalysts. But where and who assembles the new muscular cell? What happens if the demand of the physical effort or strain is not met?
Each specialized cell is created by its corresponding specialized tissue. The muscle cell is made predominantly by protein. Proteins are created at demand when the muscle is strain. The new muscle cells are formed by little corpuscles called satellite cells that are stored locally in the muscular mass. But the excessive hypertrophy generates more protein so called myostatin which is known to supress the further grow of the local satellite cells; if the muscle demand still continues and the needs are not met by the hypertrophy, then the excessive myostatin can start to stimulates various other organs then the muscle tissue itself who becomes unable to provide more resources for its further grow. Then a new protein cell that is meant to contribute to the numerical increase of muscle cells might be created somewhere else, by the various organs, which might even plan to transport it through the circulation to set up new muscle cells.

'Cancer' could then appear in a normal person at demand; when the muscle is excessively stimulated, and it gets enough hypertrophy for the amount of resources obtained, but produces enough myostatin,to supresses the satellite cells but still new muscle cells are needed. Could be this a mechanism for cancer?
Could ‘cancer' originally be meant to become additional muscle tissue and Is ‘cancer' a physiological mechanism meant to develop new muscle cells?
Could be the unbalance between the need and supply with new muscle cells at the origin of cancer?

0
Share:
progress indicator
  • Jul 8 2013: Aren't there many kinds of cancer? Cells are mutating all the time. I'll look back later. However, I don't see where this is going and how you have limited it.
    • Jul 8 2013: Yes true, are different type of cancers, the lung for example can host different cancers but not so many. Muscles with high demands we have mainly in the heart and skeletal muscles. If we add the smooth muscle, are 3 main types.
      I'm wandering what's the structural association between the precursors of muscle cells and cancer stem cells. Also, if exist a precursor of cancer stem cell, does it not really looks like a muscle cell?
      Another interesting thing is that in cancer we lose muscle mass, phenomenon called cachexia , which is the reverse of the concept, when the provider is the muscle in this case and the cancer is the user of the proteins.
  • thumb
    Jul 8 2013: Thank you for the knowledge. If we do not consume an efficient amount of protein in our diet then is the muscle to create proteins, as it is strained, still able to do so? What determines what site proteins go to (hair, reproduction, muscle generation...)?
    • Jul 8 2013: This is the trick, if the muscle is strained, is hypoxic, that's mean the demand is too high there but the blood is busy to get rid of the lactic acid and other metabolites. If another tissue offers to supply with the new cells, then another cell line can appear anywhere else. We not always utilise the tissues equally, if one is not so busy at some point is more prone supply with new generation of cells.
      • thumb
        Jul 9 2013: I'd love to learn more. Is there a trend in people that exercise regularly have less chance of developing cancer?