TED Conversations

David Grammer

This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »

The Best Justice Money Can Buy

The US legal system often seems skewed in favor of those who can afford the best representation. Would justice be better served by having lawyers assigned randomly? What might the unintended consequences be of such a system?

0
Share:

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

  • Jul 10 2013: David Grammer,

    The US legal system is skewed in favor of those who can afford the
    best representation.

    To those non-believers out there. .. Merely take a tour of your local
    county jail, or a look at your State Prison.
    Be sure to visit those Dungeons used as punishment cells.
    With full time Lights on or off?
    ..And don't ask what day you get out. ..Ask what season.
    ===
    Having Lawyers at all is at best a nasty thought, and an expensive one.
    ===
    Would justice be better served by having lawyers assigned randomly?

    Not for the Lawyers.
    They would have to find a way around such a system.
    Otherwise they would go broke quick.
    ===
    What might the unintended consequences be of such a system?

    No change. ..Our legal system is corrupt bottom to top.
    ===
    The ballpark belongs to the Justices. ..They make the rules and
    the rules do not favor the accused. Poor Lawyers get Poor Perps.

    When the biggest building in town is the Court House, you know
    something is rotten in Denmark.

    Why over the years, the crooks haven't rebelled is a mystery.
    ..If they ever did, Justice would have to change.
    Go back to sleep Judge, no worries!!!
    • Jul 10 2013: How might the current system be changed; both what might those changes be and how might they be effected?

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.