TED Conversations

This conversation is closed.

Who deserves to be under surveillance the people or the government?

We're hearing all this stuff about PRISM and NSA about surveillance, and cameras on our roads, there was a report of New Jersey looking to implement drone surveillance on the turnpike even in 2015.
My opinion on this is that we, the people don't need surveillance as time has shown that we are not the corrupt ones. Every attack or massacre that has occurred has had governmental finger prints all over it, and a right or two gets diminished immediately after.
So who deserves to be watched 24 hours out of the day? Our police force, military, and government? Or the potential casualties in the next attack.
Who would watch channel(s) devoted to unedited reality tv on various governments and military forces around the world? I would :)

Topics: Surveillance
Share:

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

  • Jun 26 2013: lol, and how do you defend the killing of the bees and the creation of superbugs? Or the fact that GM foods require more pesticides because of the super bugs? Or how food is being genetically altered with pesticides in it?

    Why give us food that has no long term tests? Whats the big deal about labelling and letting the consumer make the conscious decision of whether they want to purchase it or not? Why was the Monsanto Protection Act necessary if the food is safe? Why buy off a bunch of politicians if the food is safe? Are they eating GM foods? I doubt they give it to their dogs...
    I cant recall there being a policy that says distribute the goods before they are tested and regulated.
    And I dont know about you, but I've never seen a fruit or vegetable conceive with a fish, yet there's fish genetics in fruits and veggies...
    Yea, I guess I am one of those people... :)

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.