TED Conversations

Lucas Avelleda

Athlete, International Shotokan Karate Federation

TEDCRED 500+

This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »

How to overcome mediocrity?

"Do you know what lies at the bottom of the mainstream? Mediocrity."
Death in Venice, Thomas Mann

Mediocre: Ordinary; not extraordinary; not special, exceptional, or great; of medium quality;

How to bring people out of mediocrity?
Why do people feel attracted to mediocrity?
Where does extraordinary ideas come from?
How does mediocrity affect our lives?
What are the things that can help us find those areas of interest and what can help us explore and go from ordinary to extraordinary?
How is mediocrity related to happiness?

+1
Share:
progress indicator
  • Jul 7 2011: Become a perpetual student. Do not fear getting your hands dirty. Keep a daily log for future review.
    Best ofluck. Sorry that I do not seak portugese.
    Audios
  • thumb
    Apr 13 2011: Check out this TEDex talk it speaks right to the heart of part of the problem I believe.

    http://www.ted.com/talks/dave_meslin_the_antidote_to_apathy.html
  • thumb
    Apr 12 2011: (Great Question!)
  • Apr 12 2011: (this is part 3 of 3)

    I already posted these links in another conversation about education, but I think it's relevant here too. Especially in part 2, in this interview, Isaac Asimov touches on things that I think will take people out of mediocrity. It boils down to, in his words, following your own bent.
    Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1CwUuU6C4pk
    Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJAIERgWhZQ
    Part 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FEHtt5sGbTw

    Btw. note that I do agree with his opinion about charlatans in mysticism, but I also think there are some key lessons from mysticism that are relevant here as well. In fact much of my previous answers here about broadening your perspective and seeing multiple different aspects simultaneously, are very much related to the very down-to-earth heart of mysticism, once you dispense with the nonsensical vagueness around it (which admittedly represents a large part of it, and that's sad). Here's someone who I think has a more realistic take on it, for anyone interested:
    http://markmeijer.blogspot.com/2011/01/quoting-alan-watts.html

    In short, as said, the idea of mediocrity necessarily represents a narrow perspective. The antidote is to broaden perspective. Isaac Asimov mentions mysticism as something bad. So with the help of that Alan Watts quote, I'd rather mention it now as essentially equivalent to broadening your perspective. Hope I'm making sense.
    • thumb
      Apr 12 2011: Mark, thank you posting the links to Asimov, I think I must have been living in a cave for the last 55 years. He is amazing! Who in the hell rites 400 books? What a huge inspiration to no be mediocre!
      • Apr 13 2011: Quite a number eh? :P. I didn't know it was that much either, until I saw that interview. But surely you'd heard of Asimov before?
    • thumb
      Apr 12 2011: Now that's an extraordinary answer, Mark, thank you very much for sharing your ideas, blog and the interview!
      Starting with your first paragraph, I think we face a paradox when we want everybody to become extraordinary, don't we?
      About your first answer, I wonder why society stigmatizes differences in people and how to make it stop doing so. I don't know if you're familiarized with Democratic Education (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_education). This system basically allows students to choose what they want to learn. In my opinion, it's a good way to be who you are and be happy on what you're doing. It's also an excellent way to become extraordinary, I think.
      I woud like you to explain why do you think that extraordinary ideas comes from ordinary people. That sounds like a very interesting point to me.
      • Apr 13 2011: Maybe it's a paradox, like I said if everyone is extraordinary, then that will be the new mediocre. But I also suggested that everyone already is extraordinary. The question remains of course, extraordinary with regards to what? Extra-ordinary just means outside the norm. Left-handed people are outside the norm. Grey eyes are outside the norm (for humans anyway, always check assumptions). 7-foot humans are outside the norm, and so are 4-foot humans (adults anyway, always check assumptions). 140 IQ is outside the norm for human adults, and so is 60 IQ.

        And these are just vague and broad sweeping global norms, and some may be trivial or meaningless (in some view), others less so (in some view). But for example, whether people are surprised about a white president or a black president, depends on what continent you're on. Local norms tend to be more specific than global ones.

        From time to time, certain attributes meet certain circumstances and result in spectacular achievements. More accurately, those attributes are themselves circumstances, and results of other circumstances. Who gets the credit? And who or what is responsible for all those circumstances? What makes something or someone extraordinary? I don't know. It's not a simple answer, there's no hard line, and it depends hugely on perspective.

        Then again, what is "the norm"? What is ordinary? What is mediocre? Is it some set of values within a certain mathematically appropriate range? What is it that makes this particular range so important in reality (not in mathematics)? What is it that makes this particular set of values so important? What values are included and what values aren't, and why? Whatever the answers, it sounds to me like a matter of statistics and paperwork and judgement calls, that are all ultimately arbitrary.
      • Apr 13 2011: Instead of a paradox, maybe it's just another one of those things where different angles of perspective on the same thing produce apparently different conclusions that are not mutually exclusive, as I've mentioned in an earlier post. Neither mediocre nor extraordinary is an absolute. I'm convinced that actually all things work this way, and I'm also convinced that is an important fact of life which has enormous consequences, but which tends to be overlooked.

        That's also why I suggested that extraordinary ideas come from ordinary people. Again, not an absolute. But in some sense, everyone is just an ordinary human being. One could say that someone with an extraordinary idea is an extraordinary human being. But when did that happen? Was he already extraordinary before he got the idea? If so, then who is not extraordinary? If not, then again, what is it exactly that makes anyone extraordinary?

        Maybe you know the expression "a hero is an ordinary person in an extraordinary situation", or something like that. Is it even a person who can be ordinary or extraordinary, or is it merely circumstances? As Alan Watts would point out, they are inseparable. Again it's a matter of perspective (different angles, different aspects, etc), and I think all are equally valid at the same time.

        Btw. I didn't know about that wikipedia article, thanks. Looks interesting.
  • Apr 12 2011: (this is part 2 of 3)

    - How does mediocrity affect our lives? See previous question. In mathematics it's called an "attractor". What we call mediocrity is simply a range of common states around which most of us see ourselves end up. Emphasis on "see ourselves", because really it's only a matter of perception, just like mediocrity is itself a matter of perception (and a rather limited one). Nobody is mediocre in every conceivable sense, and everybody is mediocre in some sense. So how does it affect our lives? It doesn't, only our limited perception of it does. It makes us think and do things when it really shouldn't. See also question about happiness.

    - What are the things that can help us find those areas of interest and what can help us explore and go from ordinary to extraordinary? See other questions.

    - How is mediocrity related to happiness? Only via our self-made conceptual framework. If you believe that you're mediocre in whatever way, and you believe that is reason to be unhappy, you will feel unhappy, and you will only see yourself in those ways which you think make you mediocre, which will keep making you feel unhappy. In other words, we make ourselves feel unhappy with our own selective thoughts. Good news is, we don't have to. Broaden your perspective and re-evaluate your definitions. Try to find different aspects in everything, including yourself. Try to see different angles, and know that they are not mutually exclusive. Catch yourself when you're using your thoughts and concepts and fixed viewpoints to make yourself feel bad (or happy for that matter, be real and use that realism to your advantage, confront yourself and shed your fears).
  • Apr 12 2011: (this is part 1 of 3)

    What is mediocre now hasn't always been mediocre, and won't always be mediocre. If everyone were somehow extraordinary, then that would be the new mediocre. In that sense, everyone already is extraordinary. But as Fernando also mentioned, we give it all up for a sense of belonging to a larger group. Nothing wrong with belonging somewhere, but something wrong with it being a compulsion, and also something wrong with wanting to belong to a group that demands you give up your own nature.

    - How to bring people out of mediocrity? People seek refuge in mediocrity because, so long as they appear to be the same as "everyone else", it decreases the chance of becoming an outcast. So, firstly, stop stigmatising differences in people. Secondly, stop being afraid. Seeking refuge in mediocrity will only increase your fear of becoming an outcast. In some sense, everybody belongs somewhere, but in another sense everybody is an outcast at some point. Being afraid of it will not help. With these two things, maybe people will feel more free to be as they are. Extraordinary.

    - Why do people feel attracted to mediocrity? See previous question. Aside from refuge, it also has an element of self-pity. "Why would I be anything extraordinary?" Of course then they compare themselves to someone who they see as extraordinary in some sense, and then they want to be extraordinary in just that sense, instead of coming to terms with who they themselves really are. Naturally, the way you yourself are, you don't tend to think of as extraordinary.

    - Where does extraordinary ideas come from? From ordinary people.
  • Apr 12 2011: well i recently read a book called the fear of freadom by erich fromm in wich the basic idea is how whe cannot free ourselves because by doing so we retreat from society we become us, but this makes us sad because it makes us feel alone so we have the need of belonging to society and the only way to do this is by sacrificing a part of us if not all in order to be what you call mediocre
    i think this may answer your second question...
    and i think the only way of stop being mediocre is for people to do what they are happy doing with people who are also happy doing that and doing it because they want to i guess like a university for kids in witch they would explore what they like since the beginning and devote their lives to their passion and have a job as soon as they leave ...
    its really a complicated matter you know how to know what can a person be extraordinary at its the key if this comes in the genes maybe that way ... i think for starters we should divide schools in art phisical education and ciences and let people combine stuff into what they want maybe like that and not sufocating the kids with grades just like learn what you want ... just thoughts saludos
    • thumb
      Apr 12 2011: Hi Fernando, thanks for sharing your ideas with us!
      By reading what you wrote, I think we can conclude that we're happier when we're not ordinary, even though we have to stop belonging to a "group" or society. Here's why:
      - Are you happy belonging to a group where you're you're not happy on the things you are doing? Don't you prefer to do things that you like and that you're passionate about? Is it worthy to stay in this group or change to another one, where you can do the things that you really want? Is the "sacrifice" that you mentioned really worthy? (take a look on Mark's first topic). I think that when you can't express yourself the way you want you're not going to be happy. The thing is to look for people and groups that have the same "nature" as you.
      - I agree with you that one of the best ways to move from mediocrity to extraordinary is by doing what you like with the people you're happy with. That's an excellent point, Fernando! I think that sharing ideas is one of the best ways to discover things you're very interested and also to find people who have ideas related to yours.
      About this "university for kids" that you mentioned, did you know that there's a school in Portugal where students are given the right and responsibility to choose what to do with their time and attention? It's called "Escola da Ponte" I suggest you to take a look at this link to understand it better: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_education
      Tell me what you think about it after reading!
      Saludos!
  • thumb
    Apr 11 2011: I would say that courage is involved in autonomy read (extra-ordinary. You have to shed some notions that just don't resonate with you and do some original thinking and find your own truth.
  • thumb
    Apr 11 2011: Hi Lucas:

    Nice topic, I think mediocrity is part of the life for most of us (if not all of us).
    It’s hard for me to imagine someone that is extraordinary in all aspects of life, mediocrity is a large part of our life (you buy clothes at the same store, brush your teeth, take showers, have a car, use a cell phone, sleep at night, etc) what I mean is that most of our life’s are mediocre (or normal or standard) but people (not all) have the ability to focus on something they are interested and do something different / extraordinary (while being mediocre in the rest of the areas).
    So the question should be what are the things that can help us find those areas of interest and what can help us explore and go from ordinary to extraordinary.

    Regards!

    JB
    • thumb
      Apr 11 2011: Hi Julian, thank you very much for posting, I've just added your last question to the topic's description.
      I agree with you (and Thomas Mann), mediocrity is part of the life of most of us, however, if we can't stop being mediocre in all aspects of life, what are the aspects on which we should not be mediocre?
      Do you think that mediocrity is somehow related to happiness? Because I agree that when we find areas of our interests we are more likely to go from ordinary to extraordinary. Extraordinary people do things that they like, so they should be happier, don't they?
      A good way to find areas of interest would be sharing ideas and being open minded, to learn and try new things. I discovered my passion, Karate, by accident when I was 6 years old, but I think this is not the best way to find our areas of interest.
      • thumb
        Apr 15 2011: Hi Lucas!

        I believe it can be any aspect that the person finds relevant, from politics, to tasting all different types of coffee to homeschooling their kids, etc. having a rule on what should be is bad for the process.
        Happiness is a whole different discussion, I don’t know if there is a link and it depends on what you consider happiness to be. From my perspective, if you spend more time doing something you enjoy, then you should be happier, but again you could easily argue against that.
        I don’t have a cool example like Karate, but I can say I’m good at board games if that counts…

        Regards!

        JB
  • Apr 11 2011: This question really fascinated me. However, if everyone is extraordinary, then how the world will be? Someone has to be mediocre so that some can be extraordinary. What is opposite of extraordinary? not mediocre. It may be non extraordinary. Any thoughts?
    • thumb
      Apr 11 2011: That's a good point, Prabhakar, thank you for posting!
      I think that society needs to reach a point where most people have the ability to analyze events and ideas from different perspectives. This way, we'll have more creative people, with many different ideas and preferences. If by being creative and different we're being extraordinary, I don't think extraordinary will become mediocre, but now that you mentioned I'm not so sure about it. What do you think?