TED Conversations

This conversation is closed.

This is how I believe gravity could work. If anyone can find any flaws that I can't please tell me as this is a developing theory.

An Atom, the primary building block. This tiny structure of Protons, Neutrons and electrons has 2 types of charges that push like charges away and bring opposite charges closer. If there's 30 protons (Zn) there will most likely be 30 electrons. This is in order to have an equal charge, where 30 protons will have a 30e charge, 30 electrons will produce a 30e- charge and because these atoms have charges they are able to attract other atoms within close proximity and start forming conglomerations with an even greater combined charge.

So what if a planet has such a dense concenraion of protons and electrons at it's extremely compressed core that each the negative and positive charges effect the atoms witin our bodies indescriminately, attempting to pull not us, but the building blocks that create us, into the depths of the earth.

This made me think about why we dont just fall through the ground to the core.. and then the painfully obvious answer came to me.. "We would, if we could." but we can't namely because there are other materials held beneath us which prevent us from doing so.. almost like electron shielding preventing valence electrons from dropping to the nucleus, but instead of electrons stopping us from dropping it is dirt, rock, sand, metal and other materials beneath us which stop us from plummeting into the centre.

This is what I think gravity could be..

Indescriminate electromagnetic force...

the way planets, suns, and black holes seem to operate in my mind reinforce my idea.


Closing Statement from Jared Stevens

Thank you to all those who contributed and with what people have put forth, some constructive and others just.. Not so much. But with all that has been put forth I decided that I was inexplicably.....


the biggest flaws pointed out were that gravity is a separate force from electomagnetism and has been proven to be so.
The thing about the neutron clouds. Thank you to Jimmy Strobl I'm rating you as the most helpful in this conversation.

Thanks again everyone who contributed.

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

  • thumb
    May 27 2013: Your approach seems to hit at a clue, but it suffers from one flaw. Gravity is not an electric force.

    There is no charge associated with it, and is a fundamental force.

    This nature is what has baffled science to this day. The only things we know about gravity is that the presence of mass is correlated with higher gravitational forces. And the force is so tiny that it can barely hold onto a thin layer of atmosphere even for mass the size of the earth. (Take a look at the moon, even though it is so large, it has no atmosphere.)

    Electronic force which you referred to on your example is a short distance high intensity force similar to magnetism. This is not to be confused with gravity despite its similarities.

    The best theory we have as of now is one Einstein gave us of the bending of the space-time continuum wherever there was mass.
    • May 29 2013: Interesting.. the only way I could justify the lack of a charge is if a positive and negative charge are balancing and providing a neutral electrical charge but that seems a little too far-fetched to me.. Thank you by the way I've lightly brushed on Einsteins theories but I often find them difficult to completely grasp but I will look into them further as I get a bit smarter.

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.