TED Conversations

Jared Stevens

This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »

This is how I believe gravity could work. If anyone can find any flaws that I can't please tell me as this is a developing theory.

An Atom, the primary building block. This tiny structure of Protons, Neutrons and electrons has 2 types of charges that push like charges away and bring opposite charges closer. If there's 30 protons (Zn) there will most likely be 30 electrons. This is in order to have an equal charge, where 30 protons will have a 30e charge, 30 electrons will produce a 30e- charge and because these atoms have charges they are able to attract other atoms within close proximity and start forming conglomerations with an even greater combined charge.

So what if a planet has such a dense concenraion of protons and electrons at it's extremely compressed core that each the negative and positive charges effect the atoms witin our bodies indescriminately, attempting to pull not us, but the building blocks that create us, into the depths of the earth.

This made me think about why we dont just fall through the ground to the core.. and then the painfully obvious answer came to me.. "We would, if we could." but we can't namely because there are other materials held beneath us which prevent us from doing so.. almost like electron shielding preventing valence electrons from dropping to the nucleus, but instead of electrons stopping us from dropping it is dirt, rock, sand, metal and other materials beneath us which stop us from plummeting into the centre.

This is what I think gravity could be..

Indescriminate electromagnetic force...

the way planets, suns, and black holes seem to operate in my mind reinforce my idea.

0
Share:

Closing Statement from Jared Stevens

Thank you to all those who contributed and with what people have put forth, some constructive and others just.. Not so much. But with all that has been put forth I decided that I was inexplicably.....

WRONG..

the biggest flaws pointed out were that gravity is a separate force from electomagnetism and has been proven to be so.
Also.
The thing about the neutron clouds. Thank you to Jimmy Strobl I'm rating you as the most helpful in this conversation.

Thanks again everyone who contributed.

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

  • May 28 2013: A so-called "black hole" is neither black, nor a hole. It is a sphere. What element or elements is that body made of. Obviously it is not just one huge atom because there are varying sizes of these phenomenon in the universe, thus implying that whatever they are made from is a kind of atom that hasproperties so powerful we can't bring it into a lab and study it. But since there are super massive BH's (I refuse hence for to call them holes) there are differing size communities of the atoms that make up a BH. Why can't we not assume there to be some of this material at the core of all spherical celestial bodies. Nothing is round for no reason. And "gravity" have never been a sufficient enough reason for me. Galaxies spin in a 2-D orbit around a SMBH, planetary systems orbit stars on a 2-D plane. Just because something doesn't fit on our periodic table of elements which can exist without knocking the planet off it's axis, doesn't mean there isn't something we don't yet understand that is so powerful it makes the universe possible rather than being a mass expanse of free flying soot. You're on a good track to wonder about this. But I don't think the planet makes it's gravitational properties, something which has that force causes planets, stars and moons to configure around them. --It's chicken or egg and there is no concluding that anything just happens, something causes it to happen (and it ain't god). What is the physical property of the stuff that makes up the sphere we primitive dolts have dubbed a "black hole? Can't get near one to find out lest you become equally distributed grit on it's surface. Nay?
    • May 29 2013: Hmmm.. I like this explanation.. Okay so let me pose a question to you. well two actually..

      At the core of our planet do you think we will find new elements forming that are higher in the periodic table than what we currently have due to the immense pressure of a planet surrounding it?
      and
      How much pressure could we imagine not to be on the surface of a 'BH' :) but at it's core?

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.