TED Conversations

Katrina Holcomb

student of biology, University of Oregon

This conversation is closed.

Will the Belo Monte Dam project on the Amazon River cause more harm to the environment or will it be a good source of energy for Brazil?

The Amazon rainforest is an internationally recognized epicenter of biodiversity. Countless campaigns to stop the cutting and burning these rainforests have fallen on deaf ears. Now the Brazilian government plans to build what would be the world's 3rd largest dam [1] on the beautiful and ancient Amazon River. The Belo Monte project would span the Xingu River with 3 different dams: 233MW Pimental, 233MW Bela Vista, and 11,000MW Belo Monte. In addition, two artificial canals must be built to divert the river, which together will span more area than the Panama Canal.

These dams will have a myriad of negative impacts on the local environment. Construction of the dam will cause about 400-640 sq km land upstream to become flooded for a reservoir - an area equal to the size of Chicago. The town of Altamira will be flooded as well as countless acres that house the region's tribal populations. The impact on biodiversity includes 6-8 species of fish endemic to the Amazon River that will likely go extinct as well as a 2% decrease in the total forested area of the Amazon rainforest.

Organisms endangered by the construction of Belo Monte cannot verbalize their traumatic destruction of their ecosystem, but the indigenous people of the Amazon can; they are currently protesting the construction of the Belo Monte project through an "occupy" movement.

Belo Monte project is the first of many dam projects planned for the Brazilian portion of the Amazon River. Do these indigenous people have a right to decide what happens to their ancestral homeland? Or is the Brazilian government in the right by providing power for the majority of their country? Will the Belo Monte become the Belo "Muerte" dam (aka dam of death)?

Here's a 10 minute video that covers the impact the Belo Monte dam on the Amazon:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-seAAIsJLQ [1]

Related articles:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/apr/03/brazil-dam-activists-war-military [2]


Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

  • thumb
    May 14 2013: Perhaps this is a situation where giving a monetary value to ecosystem services could be useful in convincing people about the importance of preserving the rainforest. This project will have a huge negative impact to the environment and the indigenous peoples there, but evidently the corporations and Brazilian government who have control over this project do not see this. If we put the scale of these costs in terms of money, I think they will be much more receptive. If they don't build the dams, they are losing out on a lot of money, so you have to make the alternative solution more worth it to them than the dam. If you can calculate what monetary the loss of those trees, fish, and land will be it might disuade them building the dam (assuming the cost is higher than the potential profits from the dam).

    When large amounts of money are involved, especially for a developing nation, simply telling a big organization not to do something because it is wrong/harmful is not going to stop them. What will is determining that they would actually lose money through the disruption of ecosystem services, and that the profit from the dam will not offset the costs.

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.