TED Conversations

Chris Anderson

Curator, TED

TEDCRED 500+

This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »

Should anyone be able to upload their TEDTalk to TED.com?

YES: because there are thousands of invisible geniuses out there. Let's bring their wisdom to the world! The TED crowd will quickly vote up the good ones.

NO: it will plunge the site into an ocean of mediocrity. The best thing about TED.com is that it's curated. Every talk is good. Don't turn it into youtube

+30
Share:
progress indicator
  • Ajay D

    • +2
    Feb 25 2011: Definitely a big “NO”
    TED has established itself and any & all ideas/intellect if worthy can find its way to this PLATFORM. Once on that, it stands to gain more and has no scope of any loss/decline due to delay/timing whatsoever.
    It’s on its journey to be a CURRICULUM itself as it covers most facets of fundamental learning including attitude for everybody; teachers, students, experts & the community.
    If people at large want to offer their intellect, they can contribute to organizing more local TED’x events and get noticed to be elevated to the main TED PLATFORM. This will enable them to rejuvenate their ideas.
    TED Conversation is already a finely cut avenue for enthusiasts.
  • thumb
    Feb 25 2011: No, it would lead to further decline of quality of TED talks. Quantity is not better than quality. If you want quantity, you can get it on Youtube already (and there are pockets of quality on Youtube).
  • thumb
    Feb 25 2011: Mayhaps people could mark their YouTube videos as "TED Talk" and TED, if it chooses, could sort them out from there?
  • Feb 25 2011: I like the concept of "TED: Collaboration." I will say "yes" but i think that TED's orchestrated talks should be kept separate from uploaded talks. I appreciate TED's screening of talks.

    In addition, TED should integrate more face-to-face conversation instead of all upload/download, like here on TED conversation. TED should integrate video into this interface instead of just comment-lists. I would love to be able to have real conversations with other people in the TED community. Check out www.theinteract.net/main for instance.
  • Feb 24 2011: TED becoming youtube is a little improbable. If you read the comments on the conversations (and everybody is free to join these conversations, easier and quicker than uploading to youtube) you cant' find garbage. TED is already a solid community with loyal members (registered or not) sharing a common vision. So the filter is already functioning.

    Of course TED should filter any content, and that means resources, but as I said TED is a huge community.
    So i think, YES, a larger conversation could benefit all of us.
  • thumb
    Feb 24 2011: I have to agree with the "NO" crowd on this topic. While I am a huge supporter of having the 'little guy' become noticed, (I myself am one of those little guys working to become noticed) it is important that TED be different from YouTube. TED fills a niche for video presentations and education very nicely.

    Philip
  • Feb 24 2011: Yes and No:

    It should be a balance that would involve some major moderation. If the content is screened by some TED staffers it will keep it from becoming a mess of how to's, unintentionally offensive messages, and empty warm fuzzies.

    I think it would be great, but it may not be practical.
  • thumb
    Feb 24 2011: i say YES to the idea but with some regulations that i crystalized into a potential project that i call "TEDcollaborative " ,heres how i see it:

    -TEDcollaborative is new seperate project (the same concept like the TEDx initiative)
    -TEDcollaborative would have a definite theme ,and the speakers will be collaborators from all over the world .
    -the speakers would record their talk ,obeying the normal TED brilliant format,and upload it to a special page on TED.
    -after a screening process by TED adminstration to make sure that the talk follows the guidelines.it ll be available for the TED community to see it.
    -then all the talks will go through a voting process to choose the best talks that ill be the official talks of that specific TEDcollaborative event and then they become a TEDtalk

    why this project?
    -it ll give the opportiunity to those with great ideas but can never make it to the TED stage to have their voices heard.
    -it wont plunge the site with ocean of mediocrity as only a few selected talks will become a TED talk.
    -and of course you can never truly know if something will work or not until you try it.so i guess experimenting is the keyword heer.i also believe that there was alot of concerns about the TEDx project especially that TED gave their brand for others to use,but the project eventually proved to be a big success.

    some concerns:

    -there are other websites like youtube that ppl can share on what they have:i say that whats special about TED is its brilliant format,not just the exposure.

    -it ll be like video blogging:the solution for this lies in the guide lines and briefing on how to make it as much of a TED talk as possible.guidelines should include how the background should look like,the quality of recording,the posture of the speaker,...etc

    thats all : )
  • thumb
    Feb 24 2011: YES : we could find someone who have worthy ideas. but some guideline or regulation seem to be positively necessary. also we could think about the category of fields like TED conversations. The TED crowd will be find the talks with great ideas.
  • Feb 24 2011: NO. We already have many other places to post videos if you like. But I also like the ideas from Kevin Nakajima to make it possible to submit to a committee or reviewers for possible inclusion in TED.
  • L Lum

    • 0
    Feb 24 2011: My vote would be "No". As others have mentioned, the TED format is what distinguishes it from Youtube. Reading Erik Harpstead's comments, I like that "it takes the community to get it there" - that the passion and the drive of a "story" or "talk" inspires people to bring it forward for other people to see. This really shows in the content which is what inspires me to return and to maybe see the world with a different viewpoint.
  • thumb
    Feb 24 2011: It seems that the biggest problem is vetting the deluge of videos. If TED staff sort through the videos then TED incurs a large expense. If you institute a popular voting system then you lose some of the esteem of the TED brand. No one doubts that there are 'hidden geniuses' out there, it's all a matter of finding them.

    What about a separate site, where users could upload their videos? (fitting some loose criteria about vulgarity, format etc) A voting system would cut back a large portion of the crap, making it easier for TED staffers to pick and choose from the best videos. The voting system would be like beta testing, and so long as the videos that make it to the TED site are curated and selected by TED staff members, these videos would uphold the tradition of excellence that TED provides. But what about the videos that for one reason or another stay hidden? If there was an option to submit or nominate a video we might be able to catch some of the ideas that would otherwise have slipped through the cracks.

    A skillfully crafted video submission, viewing, discussion and voting system on a separate site could bring to light many hidden geniuses. Having TED select which videos will make it onto TED.com would ensure that only the best videos make it.

    So I say yes, as long as the manner by which the videos are chosen will uphold the dignity and authority of the TED name.
  • thumb
    Feb 23 2011: Chris, is it possible that there could be a forum similar to TED Conversations where short Ted Talks could be uploaded for a short period of time. That way it could also be a learning opportunity for those inspired to participate and we could learn though feedback.
  • Feb 23 2011: What about WikiTED? We can have the community do the curating. Start the process by having the putative speakers make a One-minute presentation on video and then they can present a written thesis. The WikiTED volunteers/mob can act as curators and invite the approved speaker to develop their talk. If there is sufficient interest in a particular jurisdiction the speakers can be invited in a local meet up. This is part of the focus of TEDx but WikiTED can simply focus on the collaborative forum of letting "everyone" participate or curate.
  • Feb 22 2011: I don't think anyone should be able to upload their talks, but everyone should be able to submit their talks to possible viewing as directed by the leaders of TED. This way you can pull some new people into the conference with bright new insight that may undervalue their personal wisdom.
    • Feb 23 2011: i agree, though i think it should go further. if rejected talks were given feedback it would allow the rejection to at least be a learning experience, and the submitter will hopefully use some thought and their next talk will be better and hopefully accepted.
  • Feb 22 2011: no - TED should be about quality not quantity. Not all ideas are worth spreading.
  • Feb 22 2011: No and Yes.
    TED isn't ready for it in its current form.
    I think you are anticipating a new form of collaborative system based on hyper-participation.

    It would be better to use a new form like social network and game (role playing game) to motivate and organise this new era of TED.

    It has to be accessible from everywhere (smartphones).
    Autoregulated with a very strong rating system.
    Based on knowledge, wisdom and action.

    Well, a huge and complicated thing but I hope it would exist one day :)
  • thumb
    Feb 22 2011: No. Selectivity is what makes TED truly TED. Without that, TED is YouTube.

    Now, that`s not to say "opening" the site up slightly would be a bad idea. Why not accept independent TEDTalks from those invisible geniuses, screen them so as to make sure they fill the TED criteria, and put up the very best ones every X amount of time in a special section? The screening would would be a strenuous task to be sure, but I think the videos would attract considerable attention not just from viewers, but possibly sponsors, thus making the whole scheme profitable.

    I would be more than happy with that compromise, and it`s nice to see the TED staff have obviously not been too dismissive of such liberal ideas.
  • Feb 22 2011: There are a lot more talks than we see. However we also have to consider the profit of ted, which will decrease significantly in such a eventuality. Also, some speakers may dislike having their talk anline. So, underthese guidlines it can be possible to put more talks up, but not all.
  • Feb 22 2011: No. I think we already get 'Best of the web' and by having TED standards and protocols it means the site remains all HIT and no shit. You can honestly watch any video and be entertained, engaged, educated or simply amused without being distracted by poor production or limited presentation skill. TED, in my mind, is a platform that represents a sort of Everest for today's thinkers, dreamers and ideaswomen.
  • Feb 22 2011: TED is a vetted event with an audience that exhibits certain cultivated traits. TED talks that are posted on the main site should at least be vetted by regular TED attendees. Otherwise quality will suffer and will no longer be about TED. Perhaps you can satisfy your egalitarian yearnings by providing a mechanism in TED Conversations to embed YouTube videos.
  • Feb 21 2011: Absolutely not. There must at least be a screening process.
  • thumb
    Feb 21 2011: There needs to be freedom of speech. But maybe there is PRACTICE SPEECH and maybe there is MASTERY SPEECH .Perhaps we need to know INTUITIVELY and INSTINCTIVELY when speech is PRACTICING to BE speech, ie when speech is just ego and drama vs when There is MASTERY SPEECH, ie speech that stimulates mirror neurons?
  • Feb 21 2011: yes but with conditions. voters will no doubt vote up the most agreeable but not necessarily the best presented, researched, argued, and sourced. i suggest submitted talks go through guidelines and a curator system in order that the cream (or at least everything but the chaff) is passed on to be voted on, similar to the way paper publications work - everything acceptable is accepted.
  • thumb
    Feb 21 2011: YES! but in a different space, and the talk could be curated by the TED crowd and/or the TED curators (you).
  • thumb
    Feb 21 2011: Ideas worth spreading should be a free app as the knock on effect of awareness and commercial value come from why we do what we do and that is natural