TED Conversations

TED
  • TED
  • New York, NY
  • United States

TEDCRED 10+

This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »

The debate about Graham Hancock's talk

Please use this space to comment on the debate around Graham Hancock's TEDx talk, as described here:

http://blog.ted.com/2013/03/19/the-debate-about-graham-hancocks-talk/

+11
Share:

Closing Statement from TED

Thanks to all who participated in this conversation on TED's decision to move Graham Hancock's talk from YouTube to TED.com. It was scheduled as a 2-week conversation, and has now closed. But the archive will remain visible here.

We'd like to respond here to some of the questions raised in the course of the discussion.

Some asked whether this was "censorship." Now, it's pretty clear that it isn't censorship, since the talk itself is literally a click away on this very site, and easily findable on Google. But it raises an interesting question about curation. Should TED play *any* curatorial role in the content it allows its TEDx organizers to promote? We believe we should. And once you accept a role for curatorial limits, you have to accept there will be times when disputes arise.

A number of questions were raised about TED's science board: How it works and why the member list isn't public. Our science board has 5 members -- all working scientists or distinguished science journalists. When we encounter a scientific talk that raises questions, they advise us on their position. I and my team here at TED make the final decisions. We keep the names of the science board private. This is a common practice for science review boards in the academic world, which preserves the objectivity of the recommendations and also protects the participants from retribution or harassment.

Finally, let me say that TED is 100% committed to open enquiry, including challenges to orthodox thinking. But we're also firm believers in appropriate skepticism, or critical thinking. Those two instincts will sometimes conflict, as they did in this case. That's why we invited this debate. The process hasn't been perfect. But it has been undertaken in passionate pursuit of these core values.

The talk, and this conversation, will remain here, and all are invited to make their own reasoned judgement.

Thanks for listening.

Chris Anderson, TED Curator

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

  • Comment deleted

    • Comment deleted

      • Mar 22 2013: @Lime - you know, almost everything you accuse us of doing or 'might' do, TED has already done to these two speakers.
      • Mar 22 2013: @Lime
        I think you are mistaking us for skeptics - that's what they do. You know, fabricate claims of misconduct, try to get people fired, try to ruin their careers, try to close down labs, try to stop funding. Just look at what happened to John Mack. There are even organisations devoted to doing precisely that. I think, then, sir, you are projecting.

        I nearly forgot, another thing skeptics do is try to have any information they don't like removed from the public realm - although at the moment a good example of this escapes me.
      • thumb
        Mar 24 2013: Lime - you are a such a paragon of self-control, I could never imagine you flying off the handle. What is it you really get from making all your posts? Really, please let us know your secret? We don't have your name, so you can level with us and pour your heart out. Now, I'm truly fascinated at who you might be.

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.