TED Conversations

Tyler  Gross

Student

This conversation is closed.

Why not reform education around Gardener's Multiple Intelligences theory?

If kids spend 8 hours a day learning about what they love and what they're statistically brilliant in, won't such a reform benefit society in the long run?

Share:

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

  • Apr 3 2011: How do they know what they love and are statistically brilliant in? How else do they discover what they love other than by trying many different things?

    What if they love something but don't like the social economic status it limits them to? I have a friend who loves sculpting, and grew up loving art. His dad wanted him to be a successful engineer instead. Compromise? He's an architect, and a good one, but maybe he could have been better at sculpting, so does art suffer from a lack of his brilliant ideas and contributions?

    Are you considering personality testing early on to see what kids may be drawn towards? Using right brained/left brained tendencies to guide them? What if kids love things they aren't statistically brilliant in?

    I like your idea a lot. I would have loved a more specialized education earlier on. Liberal arts major in college and had I been able to study those things in more depth earlier on maybe I would be better off now. I do, however, find myself feeling really dumb when I consider how long ago it was since I had to solve for algebraic equations.

    Flesh it out for me.
    • thumb
      Apr 5 2011: Good thoughts! People who have tested in multiple intelligences have never had one clear result. ( Like Nicholas said, it's an unclear process) People tend to have 2 or 3 areas they could be brilliant in. So there is no way I could suggest an absolute school for every different kind of learner. I like scenerios. Let's do one of those.
      Your friend, the sculptor takes the quiz. He tests in as a Spatial and a Logical-Math learner. Spatial means he has the capability to learn more efficiantly when dealing with tangable/ visable results. Ligical-Math is, well, pretty obvious.
      In my vision, your friend would take the required classes (such as english, math, history..) in a way that best suits his intelligence. He might learn about History by building a model of his favorite invention during the industrial revelution. Or about music by building an instrument. I think there is a lot of need for something like this.

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.