This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »
What if every full-time employee volunteered one week of every year?
I have for years now felt that just 1 week of our time per year could evoke huge change, not only our countries landscape and start to heal us BUT how about opening our eyes to see the wonderful reward one would feel by making that the norm a part of our year/years?! AND what if the government gave a nice tax advantage to the companies that particied in such a concept....














Robert Gunter
Gail Eline
Theodore A. Hoppe 200+
"Green Up's mission is to promote the stewardship of our state's natural landscape and waterways and the livability of our communities by involving people in Green Up Day and raising public awareness about the benefits of a litter-free environment."
Everyone gets involved in someway.
http://www.greenupvermont.org/
Gail Eline
Nicholas-Nick El Nickerino
Nicholas-Nick El Nickerino
I don't believe there are any tax breaks or government incentives involved, the company just wants to be a good corporate citizen and sees the value in engaging with the community at this level.
David Roman
In the for-profit world, profits from the labor produced by additional staff cover the costs of coordination, oversight, and the tools/materials needed to do that work. In this example, the budget grows by growing profits.
In the nonprofit world, where budget flexibility depends upon donors rather than profits, you can't add volunteers if you don't have additional cash resources. Few of us would expect for-profit businesses to manage additional staff without having the cash to pay for coordination or oversight, yet some people forget that nonprofits incur costs when they work with volunteers.
Creative and positive volunteer opportunities that have lasting and real impact for the both the volunteers and the organizations require staffing and the provision of tools, materials, and space necessary to make a volunteer experience fruitful.
I have worked alongside other volunteers in the past, and many were turned off by the experience because a well-intentioned organization was not able to maximize the value of their skills.
While I would love to have more volunteers engaged with my nonprofit organization, Families In Schools, I cannot ignore the reality that we do not always have the capacity to work with more volunteers without additional dollars. I know in my heart that we could do a lot more with greater resources.
Gail Eline
Joanne Rosener
Li Kleing
Robert Gunter
Gail Eline
Ana Goelzer 500+
Barry Palmer 50+
Just to play devil's advocate, one could argue that we already accomplish the same thing, and much more efficiently, through our government social programs and our charitable institutions. The free economy already provides an efficient mechanism to assure that most people are already performing at their maximum productivity. Consequently their week of volunteer effort would be less productive. When everyone takes a week to produce less, the total effect would be a small reduction of total productivity. From a strictly economic perspective, it would make more sense to just donate one week of earnings to charity.
Even if it reduced total productivity, I think that volunteering one week per year would have many positive intangible benefits. For example, people would socialize with groups that are outside their normal experience. This would result in a better common understanding of society and its problems; also a better intermixing of ideas. A society in which volunteering is the norm would be a better society.
wes legg
Gail Eline
Larry Handeland
Gail . 50+
The way Dan Pallotta thinks about charity is dead wrong.
george lockwood 30+
Robert Gunter