TED Conversations

Manyika Sakambuki

This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »

Mention one scientific theory you think needs adjustment. Why do you think that way?

Our assumptions fashion how we see and make decisions. in the past, astronomy was defined as the study of how heavenly bodies move around the earth because it was believed that the earth was the center of the solar system. that was until a Polish Astronomer- Nicolai Copernicus changed our thinking. same as when the atom was thought to be the smallest particle until electrons, neutrinos, etc. were discovered. bring forth your ideas!

+2
Share:

Closing Statement from Manyika Sakambuki

Ok thanks! Turns out that all theories which have no direct application to the physical world wont hang around for long. Most likely, they'll stay as just ideas of the 'geniuses' which have no proof but only serve to quench our thirst for understanding certain things that seem hard to understand e.g. black holes, perpetuity of life, being able to control infinitesimally small stuff(nano techs), death... and we can go on and on. This has been a useful conversation.

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

  • Mar 15 2013: Science claims we are seeing back into time, some 14 billion years ago. Science claims that we can see that far back in time, because the light from those distant worlds and galaxies have been traveling here for those billions of years and that by such, we are looking back in time. That simply cannot be, according to science.

    Simple light cannot carry images of those far off worlds and galaxies to our telescopes, meaning, our telescopes see out to that light, illuminating those entities, disproving relativity, gravitational lensing and light theory.

    That's why I said, light cannot carry images of those worlds and galaxies, meaning, if their light speed and theory were true, we could see the light, but not the worlds or galaxies, because images cannot be carried on light.

    former CIA Director, William Casey, “We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.”
    • Mar 15 2013: Images are not "carried on light" ... images are created in the brain of the observer ... light (electromagnetic) waves impinge on the retina forming a two dimensional pattern that the brain "uses" to create a three dimensional "image" (perception).
      • Mar 15 2013: By what you write, you don't understand what I wrote.
    • thumb
      Mar 17 2013: Hi Jim

      A couple of questions. If simple light doesn't carry the information we need to form an image, what does?

      Where is the contradiction science makes when it comes to seeing galaxies far away?

      How do you think we see the galaxies and stars in the sky?

      Do you think it is a CIA conspiracy?
      • Mar 17 2013: Faisal, I hope this finds you well.

        About the CIA ---government,--is a quote that I believe is true in many respects. I believe the school systems purposely dumb down the populations, because whenever trouble arises in a country, the intelligencia is immediately attacked and that's not the lawyers, most all of them are taught too be as corrupt as the day is long. If you happen to read more that I write, you will at least see.

        Most people are cubicle smart, but not one school teaches children to think for themselves.

        Science claims we are seeing celestial bodies back in time. Perhaps I'm misinterpreting it. What is ment by,-- seeing back in time

        Using Hubble Space Telescope, astronomers have spotted seven galaxies that are all over 13 billion light years away... including one that appears to be a record breaker at a staggering 13.3+ billion light years distant. That one is seen as it was only 380 million years after the Big Bang.
      • Mar 17 2013: Faisal, here is another excerpt.--"Can we look back far enough in time to see the Big Bang?
        As we look at other galaxies we are essentially looking back in time. Can we look back far enough to see the big bang itself? If this is so and c is constant, how did we get here before the light arrived?"

        Key words Faisal, --arrival of the light.---which to me, means science is claiming we are looking at light just arriving here, carrying the galaxies images. So my question is, how can light alone, carry the images of anything, much less galaxies?

        http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/question.php?number=84
      • Mar 17 2013: The people I know need something other than light to see an image, hence a camera.
        Simple light cannot carry images of those far off worlds and galaxies to our telescopes, meaning, our telescopes see out to that light and those worlds, illuminating those entities, disproving relativity, gravitational lensing and light theory.
        • thumb
          Mar 17 2013: Hi Jim

          If you look up at the night sky without a camera do you see stars? Could you please explain how you understand this mechanism? If you believe that you are receiving some other information besides light in order to do so, could you please explain what that is.
    • thumb
      Mar 17 2013: " because images cannot be carried on light"

      does that even mean something? whoever can make out any meaning of this, please tell me.
      • Mar 17 2013: Translate please.

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.