TED Conversations

David Hubbard

This conversation is closed.

Do we need the approval of fools to correct the planet?

Intelligence must play a stronger role in world affairs. The non-aggressive few who can see past the delusions and discuss the world as it is, as well as how it might improve.

Share:

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

  • thumb
    Mar 2 2013: David,
    I am curious.....
    In another discussion, you told me, in kind of a preachy way, that we (humans) are all one....interconnected. Now you would like to seperate those you perceive to be "fools". How does that work?
    • thumb
      Mar 2 2013: Sorry I came off as preachy. We are all one but we certainly are not the same. It seems that the world is not at all rulled by reason, but by fools. The question I'm looking for input on is ; do we need thier approval to correct things? I have been hoping that we would get some suggestions
      • thumb
        Mar 2 2013: Who are "they"? I don't need anyone's approval to do my own thing toward contributing to a change in our world. Why do you need approval? And from whom?
        • thumb
          Mar 3 2013: Who are "they?" I guess those that would lose something if the correction was not in their favor. Wouldn't there be a force against any correction? Let's say we considered planetwide iGovernment. It would be opposed by every participant in the Govrnments it would supplant.
      • thumb
        Mar 3 2013: David,
        You speak of a "force against any correction"? "...opposed by every participant in the Govrnments it would supplant"? That is speculation, is it not?

        How about spending time and energy moving forward with plans, and real solutions, rather than spending time speculating about what MIGHT happen? What is the point in labeling those who may not agree with you "fools"?

        I agree with Bob...People who begin a conversation labeling and catagorizing certain groups of people "fools", has lost my participation in his/her quest.
        • thumb
          Mar 3 2013: Of course it's speculation but in general we defend what we have. And if what we have is control, we would likeley use all the power we have to continue the control. If the people that pollute the world and poison the food and kill for political gain are not fools, then the word needs redefining. My quest is for world peace.
      • thumb
        Mar 3 2013: David,
        I suggest that calling people fools, will not facilitate world peace. We draw people into a plan by recognizing qualities they have which may be useful to the plan. We do not facilitate peace by labeling and catagorizing people fools.
        • thumb
          Mar 4 2013: I agree, Colleen, that arrogance toward others does not draw them in!
      • thumb
        Mar 5 2013: No Fritzie, it does not. I suggest that it actually pushes people away.

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.