TED Conversations

This conversation is closed.

Should a person's racial and/ or aggressive behaviour in his free time be allowed to affect his work?

A man accused of slapping a toddler and directing a racial slur towards the boy on a flight from Minneapolis to Atlanta has been sacked as well as charged, his former employer has confirmed. Over reaction or just action?


Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

  • Feb 21 2013: Here's the link in case anyone's wants to read. I can't decide if it's a fair course of action or not? I am vehemently against rascism, on the other hand would certainly not wish everything I do in my spare time (nothing that outrageous anyway) to be known to my colleagues. Is it just action because the company name was mentioned? Therefore damaging the company image.

    • thumb
      Feb 21 2013: In all honesty, I think it comes down to whether or not you represent the company during your off hours. Probably the simplest way to look at this is if you are salaried or hourly worker. But still the onus is on the employer to outline work expectations and how the mission and values of the company are reflected in your work.

      I worked for a very religious organization and I am not religious. But I had a role clarification session with my report to at the beginning of my employment. I was to model and live the mission and values of the institution while I was at work but it was not imperative to my off time. Clear role expectation.

      There are a lot of jerks out there. A job is not going to stop them from being a jerk. But if their personality reflects badly on their employer, I think the employer needs to have a clarification of role expectations meeting with the employee. I really do not think a truly valued employee should be fired for a lone single mistake. If they can document a trend, have at it and fire the jerk. I would rather work with my employees to make sure they are properly educated on expectations than throw them away and start over. Just sayin.
      • Feb 21 2013: Good example, thanks. It's surely about having clear role clarification, but I also feel it's about publicity. If it hadn't been publicly known who he worked for, perhaps the company would have waited to see if he was found guilty...

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.