- Ruth-Ellen Henry
- London
- United Kingdom
This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »
Should governments decide where the poor can live?
In Camden, London there are a group of 750 plus people that live of the state and can't afford to stay there due to new legislation which has come into force. These people can't find jobs at the moment so are reliant on the government to support them with housing costs. Due to this reliance the government has stated it will relocate this group to an area outside of London with even less chance of finding employment but lower housing costs. Surely a better way is to support these people to find sustainable employment? What do you think?
Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.
Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.













James Turner 10+
Ruth-Ellen Henry
Lars Mews
The main problem nowadays is, that governments seem to believe they gonna generate money by saving money or better, cutting down their costs. That is nonsense, because the still have the same money as before. That speaks books about the general understanding of economy in the average politicians head.
To keep a business running, you need to invest. A governments long term invest is the people.