TED Conversations

Claudia Jonge

Graduate Student,

This conversation is closed.

The use of shock advertising by social marketers is an effective strategy to change behavior. Or has it contrary/counter effects?

For my graduation assignment I will research the topic of shock advertising in the Western European non profit sector. The use of shock advertising in social marketing raises besides ethical questions another: Have shocking and fear appealing advertising strategies in the non-profit sector the intended effects?

In this paper I want to research the effectiveness of shock and fear appealing advertisements used in the Western European non-profit sector. Another point I want to research is what methods and strategies can lead to optimum results and can improve the likelihood of changing behaviors without leading to anxiety or resistance. Furthermore, examining the effectiveness of the methods, one which focus on the physical elements of fear and one that focus on the social elements of fear in the advertisements.

With creating a debate about this specific subject I want to reach a number of objectives besides input for my research:
1. Receive notice of the different approaches
2. Seeking for truth with the exchange of information
3. Finding the relevance of the topic
4. Creating a meaningful opinion and create recommendations

Please leave your comments, suggestions and ideas about this topic and lets enjoy this debate.

Share:

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

  • thumb
    Mar 4 2013: Sadly there are more dumb people every day so, it is effective...
    • thumb
      Mar 11 2013: Thank you for your comment but this is not grounded. Is there any proof that a certain type of people are more manipulative?
      • thumb
        Mar 12 2013: Just think USA banks giving mortgages to people who didn't knew what they were getting into...

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.