TED Conversations

Sid Tafler

This conversation is closed.

Can democracy survive without journalism?

Journalism is dying. Can democracy survive?
What was journalism, once practiced throughout the western world,
has largely been replaced by rumor-mongering, blatant promotion and parroting,
mindless opinion writing, blather about consuming, celebrity, and worst of all, the reporter him/herself.
Do you need examples? Here is one of many. A realtor friend tells me the industry news releases he receives are printed verbatim in the so-called
newspaper in his city.
Real journalism is simply truth-finding and reporting. There is a huge
vacancy of these practices among the organs of our so-called news
media in the 2010s.
This is the result of the layoff and dismissal of thousands of journalists,
the demise and repurposing of hundreds of newspapers and other news outlets
in the last twenty years.
There may still be some reporting being practiced in isolated
pockets, but there’s no longer enough to maintain a viable culture of
journalism. That requires a critical mass of information-sharing,
feedback, competition, advancement, support from publishers and media owners,
all of which are severely lacking.
I challenge the readers of this essay: prove me wrong. Show me enough viable examples of the real thing, in the print or broadcast media or online.
Now to my question about democracy. My answer is “not likely.”
Democracy cannot survive without public awareness. If media outlets
no longer effectively explain and analyze the issues, the records and
platforms of the parties and candidates, how can voters decide who
to elect? Perhaps this partially explains why many people
have given up on democracy and no longer vote.
Perhaps democracy is on life-support, like a terminal patient on
oxygen. Will we witness its demise in the coming years, or will it
miraculously recover, given new life through new sources of information, disseminated by citizen journalists or the next generation of young reporters
through emerging forms of digital and electronic media


Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

  • thumb
    Feb 19 2013: I always appreciate critical public discourse about journalism. I think overall, I disagree with you, Sid - but perhaps I agree in this sense: it is very hard to find good journalism.

    But like Lejan, I believe that journalism has always struggled, and not always succeeded, to be more than public relations for hire. Certainly some news agencies have done better than others. And certainly some reporters have done better than others. Just like good science, good investigative journalism needs to find better ways to acknowledge and resist structural bias. And as critiques of journalism, I think we have a duty to quantify our concerns with hard data. That's no small chore.

    I am very much interested to see what happens to 'journalism' in the next couple of decades. There's so much potential.

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.