- Mohamed Mortada
- Beirut
- Lebanon
This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »
Alternative for Democracy
Democracy lacks coherence with the imperfect nature of human beings. Decisions shouldn't be taken by majorities since we have no guarantees that these majorities are right. Giving the same amount of votes for everyone means putting someone's education on the same level with another person's ignorance. Also, decision are hardly based on analysis and studies.
The idea is still theoretic but I propose giving the power to the debate that occurs between specialists in the first place and commoners on a second level. The idea consists of a scientific method which calculates advantages and disadvantages on different levels (environmental, economic, educational...) The project that provides success on more levels is executed. The matter becomes more of a democracy of advantages rather than of people.
There are laws for debating and there is a council that organizes debates. Every town, city or public institution would have a council. For now I believe that a competition is made for assigning council members which aren't more than employees but the matter is debatable.
It is possible to change every detail by debate in this system but the main idea remains the same.
Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.
Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.












Ross G
Mike Colera 10+