This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »
Are less lethal weapons a good compromise for a country that demands its Second Amendment rights but less bloodshed?
Guns are designed to kill but not all conflicts or confrontation need to end deadly. Weapons/ammunition like tasers and rubber bullets can incapacitate a person without ending their life. If these weapons are more prevalent in our society wouldn't we be safer? Or is the answer to criminals/mad men with guns really a society with more guns?
Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.
Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.














Krisztián Pintér 200+
Brian Ruckman
Krisztián Pintér 200+
Ken brown 30+
Ken brown 30+
Is there money to pay for it?