TED Conversations

This conversation is closed.

Solving gun violence in the US in today's insane political climate requires a solution that makes it painless for everyone.

First that this idea even needs to be broached in the first place is ridiculous especially given the lack of clarity in the second amendment (eg it does not specify types of arms so that should be handled by laws not as a "do what you will free for all").

That said it seems there are some major elements that would be necessary to reduce gun deaths in the US and there are some obfuscating interests embodied in the NRA that must be sidestepped or accommodated in the solution.

Four main areas of focus jump out to reduce gun deaths:

1) "mass killings" (included in this would be the 2 or 3 person shootings as well as as Newtown or Aurora types)
2) Accidental shootings
3) Non-owner shootings (eg the shooter is not the owner of the gun)
4) "black market" trading

Added to these I would say the parameter that makes gun control legislation difficult is gun manufacturer revenue stream protection using the second amendment as a shill.

So what are the necessary parameters to make something happen vs. the absurdity of what is going to happen over the next few months in Washington:

1) Figure out a way that shifting policy creates more revenue for gun manufacturers so they get the NRA on board
2) Make sure that guns cannot be used in public places or by someone other than their owner

The Idea - Mandatory gun locks and universal kill switches.

On locks, all responsible gun owners have gun safes. Why not move the lock to the gun's trigger mechanism either with a combination code or biometric locks. That would prevent unauthorized use of the gun by anyone but the owner.

On kill switches, in the same locking mechanism put a chip and actuator that freezes the locking mechanism mentioned above when it receives a certain modulated radio signal.

If mandatory then all existing guns will have to be refitted with the new bolt mechanism creating revenue streams for the gun manufacturers and on all new guns they can charge more creating more revenue.

Thoughts?

Share:

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

  • Feb 9 2013: In a civilized, democratic society, the ballot box becomes the weapon of choice and the taxing authority of government becomes the logical method of control. All costs associated with gun sales, gun violence, gun ownership. need to be paid by gun manufacturers and gun owners. If you want to own a gun, fine. Pay the costs associated with that ownership. Just as we contemplate carbon credits, we should think about gun credits. Don't forget the creation of victim violence compensation funds. I could imagine the cost of gun ownership being very expensive, but still your right to own a gun is protected.
    • Feb 10 2013: Sure Goldman-Sachs would love that, then they can trade futures on "Death By Gun".

      Then the next thing you know, they'll be, off the books, hiring sub-people to kill, just so they can turn a higher profit.

      Hey didn't that already happen with housing - were the not enough sub-prime killings already.

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.