TED Conversations

Mathew Naismith


This conversation is closed.

Is hydraulic fracturing the answer especially when you take in consideration the environmental impact it is having?

Hydraulic fracturing is polluting the underground water which comes up through the cracks caused by the fracturing of the rock & ends up in our water ways. I think we have enough pollutants to deal with above & below the ground now!!


Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

  • thumb
    Jan 16 2013: Hydraulic fracking seems like a cleaner solution & the supporters of this will tell you it’s much cleaner than coal &oil for a very good reason & the anti-frackers will tell you it’s obviously harmful for the main reason that it’s putting harmful toxins into the ground water which can in some cases rise up through cracks in the surface rocks.

    It doesn’t really matter who is right or wrong here the fact is they do use toxic chemicals to help fracture the rock & it can also release natural toxins that are already sealed in the bed rock, surly no one can argue with that so is it a better alternative? I will point out here that the oil barons & other multinationals have stopped a lot of much cleaner solutions to our energy crises like with a bloke in Western Australia who invented a fully working hydro car but was compelled to sell to a certain oil company & this is one of many so for starers the oil barons & multinational aren’t interested in free clean energy but their own pockets.

    One more thing, what does a farmer &/or resident use when their ground water that they rely on is polluted by these chemical & why frack when there are obvious cleaner solutions that these people keep stopping because there’s no many in it for them & most importantly what is more important our health or their wallets?
    Fracking links
    Suppressed invention links


Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.