TED Conversations

O'Neil Poree

This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »

The intellectual instability of our species

Supposing that our species is collectively Insufficiently intelligent (or intellectually stable enough) to now protect our ecosphere. Correspondingly, this situation risks our survival, at least, as we are now constituted.
Central questions these implications give rise to then are:
What are the fundamental causes of this inadequacy?
Can we then attempt to sponsor a Worst Case Scenario solution, such as work towards the highest possible assurance of surviving seed populations to evolve some successor human species more fit to steward a healthy natural world?

At least twice, science indicates, our sspecies has passed through bottlenecks of ten thousand or so people. during the last 800 centuries.

The Gotterdammerung I hypothesize is now surely upon us, I claim. We are going to, willy-nilly, establish sanctuary alcoves all over the world (hopefully well-designed ones) for a long period of climate catastrophe. My topic begins with our evolution within whatever we are stuck with for coming centuries of inhospitable climate.

0
Share:

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

  • Jan 15 2013: Just as "It takes a village ...", I think a little planning en mass could evoke useful suggestions about how we would protect the world if we have to start over and reinhabi it, particularly a damaged and sorely wounded version of what we have now.
    What should our rules for subsisting and coexisting with other species become in future?
    As groups we show plenty of complex examples of setting up formal rules to live by.

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.