This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »
Should we support national legislations for mandatory, free of charge and confidential HIV testing of everyone who does blood test?
Considering the tragic magnitude and destructive power of AIDS and the general welfare of the society, as well as people who suffer from AIDS or who are HIV positive, should we support national legislations for mandatory, free of charge and confidential testing of everyone who does blood test?
Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.
Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.














Lena Gorska 200+
Antonio Robateau
"Try this. If it kills you, well..."
You may have just discredited her entire presentation if not every TED "idea worth spreading".
An interesting fact, a breathalizer does not test for alhocol in the blood (the definition of drunkardness) but rather alhocol in the breath. Using Listerine can get you arrested for drunk driving. But I'm sure the law enforcement officer is right in saying there's way too many people investigating that for such a thing to have gone through unnoticed.
It's really simple. AIDS suddenly "explodes" wherever HIV testing suddenly begins. The truth must stand the rigor of evidence. I see more advertising and, more importantly, money hoarded than evidence. In fact, the longer it takes to find a cure, the richer Big Pharma gets... hmmmm... we should trust them. That is an idea worth spreading?
Love the healthy conversation.
Lena Gorska 200+