This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »
Should we invest with a specific objective of achieving immortality, or let it be just a happy consequence of fighting specific diseases?
As a TEDtranslator I have stumbled upon today on a relatively new TEDxAmsterdam 2010 talk in Amara by one of my favourite visionary scientist – Dr Aubrey de Grey.
The talk is yet to be transcribed and translated and is not visible on TED website, thus I am sharing a link to it on the YouTube.
In a nutshell, de Grey, a biomedical gerontologist, the Chief Science Officer of SENS Foundation advocates that world community should invest as much resources as possible for research into ways to slow and possibly end the process of aging – in effect leading to immortality. I am curious of your opinion on that issue.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wVyWC-dNuF0














W. Ying 10+
.
Happiness only comes from the feeling of things being A-STEP-BETTER for keeping our DNA alive.
Immortality eliminates the A-STEP-BETTER.
Then, NO HAPPINESS !!!
Who likes that ?
Lena Gorska 200+
Krisztián Pintér 200+
Fran Ontanaya 100+
It could be argued spending in immortality research not only has its intrinsic returns of investment, but also saves us the costs economic instability has, in this case, with an endeavour that may make it easier to raise taxes on the wealthiest, as they would more readily trade part of their fortune for a real chance of enjoying a substantial life extension.