TED Conversations

This conversation is closed.

Provocatively: Who should be allowed to survive?

In a TED-Talk by Juan Enriquez 3 main technological trends are presented that might in the future enable us to improve our perception and other abilities significantly. He is even saying that people with access to such technology would be "Homo Evolutis" and thus a different kind of man. They would be more powerful than "homo sapiens" because of their new abilities.

To avoid such a separation of mankind the access to the technology must be fair and regulated. So: How do we decide who gets access to it? Are socio-economic factors good selection criteria for the new kind of evolution?
As we might in the future have the opportunity to decide ourselves who evolves and who does not, let us set the "selection criteria" consciously and try to base them on more sophisticated indicators than economic or social power.
I think "survival of the moral and intelligent" would be an ideal principle. But I cannot imagine a practicable system of how to objectively find people with those traits and give them access to the technologies yet.

Just to make it clear: "Survival" is meant metaphorically and used as a synonym for getting access to the technologies that Juan Enriquez presents in his talk. There is no literal meaning or any elitistic aspect to it.

Thus the question reformulated is:
Who do you think should get access to the technologies that Juan Enriquez presents and how can this distribution be realised practically, so that it is fair and humanity is not separated into "evolutis" and "sapiens"?


Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

  • thumb
    Jan 26 2013: Just thinking about this Mathias, a man from your area, back in the 1600's I believe once quoted (roughly) A man can not govern the world who can not govern his country, a man can not govern his country, who can not govern his state...A man can not govern his city, who can not govern his home. I believe his initials were FG, but could be wrong. Anyways, I extended that past the world to include the solar system, our neighboring stars, the Galaxy and then the Universe. So what does this have to do with the seperated and fair? Well, we may need a different species to be able to govern the world as one. Have you ever wondered why we only use less than thirty percent of out brains? We need the next species to move forward. And I know, people hate change like automobiles, computers and airplanes. Over time, yes, Homo Sapiens will be wiped out but with 7 billion people that will take hundereds if not thousands of years.

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.