TED Conversations

This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »

Is everyone biased?

Some claim that they are not, others claim that everyone is.

Which is it according to you?

"Bias" According to Google:

"bi·as
/ˈbīəs/
Noun
Prejudice in favor of or against one thing, person, or group compared with another, usually in a way considered to be unfair.
Verb
Show prejudice for or against (someone or something) unfairly: "the tests were biased against women"; "a biased view of the world".
Synonyms
noun. prejudice - inclination - partiality - tendency
verb. influence - prejudice"

Topics: Bias
+2
Share:

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

  • thumb
    Jan 3 2013: Krisztián Pintér, those missteps by Reuters were symptoms of larger problems in the news media: freakish desire to cater to audiences, dangerous obsession with speed and breaking news, and the internet-speeded decline of the news media's business model.

    News is important, people have forgotten that. They take it for granted and they're cynical about its status; but I believe that hateful attitude is the kind that will get us nowhere. "reuters is also good at publishing fake pictures and fake reports." What is this, man, 4chan? I get what you're saying, but say it like a man, not like a boy.
    • thumb
      Jan 3 2013: Oh baloney. News is not important. It is advertising. News is twisted by media to sell the most advertising it can. Also known as bias. It's about money and developing a product for consumption by like minded individuals. Sometimes known as a Target Audience.
      • thumb
        Jan 4 2013: Today's news media deserves that diagnosis, but it hasn't always been that way. Newsman used to be good men, but the business model now requires too much catering to audiences, making news a product and giving people what they want -- not what they need.
    • thumb
      Jan 4 2013: one needs to be extremely stupid not to be able to explain one's behavior. i personally don't care about reuters' motivations. to me, they have proven themselves an unreliable source of information. trust is hard to gain, easy to lose.

      thanks for the recommendations. next time i will consider using four line long sentences with many adjectives and latin words instead of my usual, allegedly 4chan-ish, straight to the point brevity.
      • thumb
        Jan 4 2013: Reuters was just as disappointed in their photographers, who were mostly let go. If I run a business, hire someone I trust, am betrayed by them and then act in the right way (fire them), does my reputation deserve to crash and burn?

        And It wasn't the brevity, sir, it was the "one needs to be extremely stupid" type hateful assertions that do nothing but rally those who agree with you and enrage those who don't.

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.