TED Conversations

This conversation is closed.

Hypothetical assumption...

Regardless of accumulated assumptions, combined with study of the Earth, could it be possible that we are wrong in understanding ourselves.

Acknowledging that after thousands of years we still have no concrete answers yet carry the arrogance that would assume we do based on new assumptions.

Furthermore, if you could define the characteristics of a cancer, would one of them be ignorance?

Would the characteristics mimic mankind, self absorbed, self righteous, self denying, destructive to both itself and its environment (the only thing keeping it alive).

Would you define the assimilation of good cells to follow bad cells as a characteristic of humans convincing others to follow its ignorance?

If our vanity is correct, why are we accomplishing the opposite.

If knowledge explained that we are sheep, is that not true? And is that not a catalyst for failure?

Could we be the creators of the big bang's we teach ourselves about? And if so, how would we achieve this, could it be via the creation of black holes? And could this be achieved by awakening a dark matter which immediately begins to absorb with the vanity that we can control its actions?

And if we are this chemical reaction (thought) and did achieve our endless goals of being responsible for the expansion of the universe, would it include a explosion, pieces traveling through space (meteor showers) eventually landing on fertile soil and through evolution begin our journey carrying the knowledge that we descended from the dust of the last meteor which carried our genes to the next phase?

Would vanity be enough to block ourselves from acknowledging this?

And finally, if so, should we continue and therefore stop caring about hurting ourselves for the sake of its continuance, since the two appear to go hand in hand?


Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

    • Comment deleted

      • Jan 7 2013: Hey Mark...tapped into Jed's website, took a cruse...are all those people on drugs?

        Maybe the books tell a different story but I could not understand any of them...it was if like allot of folks that have discovered that we are at the end of our social ropes. they cut the tie and float off like a balloon (attempting to by pass the need to turn around and walk backwards to the beginning then walk again with knowledge of what is instead of the unknown and self taught method that spawn us). The end result loosing themselves into a delusional world which may or may not exist. As we all know there are those that have separated their essence or spirit and travel outside their bodies and have accomplished this through deep meditation...now arguably if that can be or not is the question as is if I take hallucinate drugs and see spirit a person without the detachment mechanism can not does that mean it is not real and possibly to see such magnificent we need to detach somehow as we are in a controlled mutation of interpretation...but wow your words/interpretation of his books do not resonate or appear to repeat on that site, it appears that they (as mentioned) broke away from the contempt of taught thought out of desperation/delusion and are now floating around...good or bad...that is an individual call, so it is good that they understand the truth regarding manipulated opinion(using your definition as my base for that assumption) but losing yourself to spite the truth about man is another...just as science studies matter, there is a truth...I will always challenge those too find it...if they stop arguing and test my theory in conversation all the answers are there...magically all we need to survive is to change that focus not cut the ties that bind us to it...or at least anchor oneself before you cut..

        I also saw a very scary word used and it was suggested his thoughts to be similar to Scientology...and that is some f't up shit by what I can put together

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.