- Gabriella Araimo
- Cosenza
- Italy
This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »
A school where fees depend on wealth,where students can borrow books instead of buying them and learn through games,music,acting and debates
A new high school for Italy ( and the world):
1. You have to pay a school fee depending on how much money you have, but you don't have to buy any book or computer because the school lend them you
2. Every subject is teached in a more interesting way: maths through games, physics and biology through experiments ,languages through music and acting, history and philosophy through reading and debates, art through practice
3.Each classroom has two teachers: one is older and/or with more experience and another one is younger and/or more enthusiastic, one teaches practice and another one explains theory, an actor or a musician work swith a language teacher; this help students also dealing with two different points of view in every situation
4. There are lessons in the afternoon, so students who live far from the school will eat at the school canteen
5. Each two weeks there will be a test or a lesson made by groups of students who have worked together on a specific topic
These are examples of school days:
Monday:
8:00-10:00 French and acting, break, 10:15- 12:15 History, Philosophy , documentary and debate, break, 12:30- 13:30 current affairs, break and lunch, 15:00- 16:30 sport, break, 16:45- 18:15 homework of a subject studied in the morning (some teachers help the students that have difficulties), end of the lessons ( no homework at home!)
Tuesday ( same timetable):
Maths and games, break, physics and experiments, break, latin, break and lunch, art and painting, homework, home
Wednesday:
English and music, break, Biology, Chemistry and open-air lessons, break, informatic, break and lunch, sport, homework, home
My purpose is to create a high school that prepares not only for University, but also for social life. What is your opinion?
Closing Statement from Gabriella Araimo
I want to thank each of you for the precious, interesting and appropriate contributions that opened my eyes and made me more conscious of the problems of any education system. First of all, the funding problem, the difficulty in convincing governments to invest in school expecially during a period of crisis. Second, the natural differences among human intelligences, interests and aptitudes. Third, vandalism. Fourth, the risk that an emphasis on debate can encourage students to find strong arguments to win rather than to understand.
However, some of us have proposed practical solutions, others have shaped their personal experience, others have simply appreciated (the no homework aspect, for example). All of these things make me hope in the future: answers are only to be found. Godspeed to everyone!













Don Rogers
Augmenting that approach is the need to have "Listening Classes" as opposed to Debate Class. Every single person I have gotten to know well who excels in debate and takes pride in being able to win, regardless which side of an argument they take, they fail horribly in humility and listening. Their relationships in life basically boils down to themselves... for all other relationships are without root, including their marriages.
Scientists should NOT have to present a dissertation or a theory. Doing so removes them from the joyous realm of enthusiastically and humbly searching for truth, to one of defending their point of view to the hurt of their joy and the strangling of humility. Then, if they wish to be funded, they must stay within certain boundaries, making sure to not step on any older and established toes. This process squelches the freedom to search for truth, and in some cases, has forced truth to be carefully hidden away, once it was unearthed. The process also engenders fears. A person with fear, cannot possibly see and examine clearly. A scientist operating under fear, is no longer a scientist. He is a conformist.
A true scientist will not shrink away from examining anything, including The Bible. Bring up the topic of Intelligent Design at a dinner function attended by scientists, medical doctors and psychiatrists, and you will hear little more than forks and knives contacting their respective plates. That is fear, and that is wrong.
Maddie S.
Everett Hill
I recently had this discussion with my students about getting the work done. They self-admitted that the lack of sleep issue had little to do with their homework. The great majority of it was that they were on Facebook, Skype, playing games, texting, or doing any number of other distracting behaviors that limited their ability to complete their work. You can not effectively multi-task. The human brain is not geared for it. Again, students were reporting this to me in a discussion. And they recognized the problem, and did not wish to do anything about it.
Armistral .
I think replicating that across the globe and for all age levels is an excellent idea, online and offline. Where the Metro Open School would be an offline version we should think about all the ways we can improve learning for everyone, for their entire lives.
http://www.wesolver.org/wiki/Universal_Lifelong_Education
I took the liberty of using some of your words to describe this: http://www.wesolver.org/wiki/School
Thank you for bringing this up!
Gabriella Araimo
george lockwood 30+
Gabriella Araimo
george lockwood 30+
Joshua Kloppers
Gabriella Araimo
Joshua Kloppers
Thank you for the good idea
george lockwood 30+
Gabriella Araimo
hcdoitsu gotweed
Gabriella Araimo
2- All men are not equal, that's true. Maths is often an obstacle for a lot of students, and I'm convinced that we should think a new way to teach it. For example, using more teachers who can work with a small group of students in the afternoon and create with their collaboration a personal teaching plan.
Have you ever heard of "Khan Academy"? It's a website where you can learn Maths through little steps. Maybe it's too late, but you can have a look anyway.
Jerome Whittington
daniel hehir 20+
Google it!
Greetings and Happy New Year from Norway!
Gabriella Araimo
Best wishes to you too !
Sri Vatsan
The kind of school system you are talking about would require a lot of funding.
And more than 90% of the parents will not be able to afford the fees, this means that the wealthy few would have to pay a lot to compensate for them.
Now there are already a lot of schools with world class facilities, teachers etc. which are there for the rich people so they will not wish to participate in this New school system.
This means that the government has to invest significantly larger amount of money in education.
I don't see this happening considering the current financial situation.May be in future some of the developed countries will be able to afford to do this,given that people demand it.
But for the majority of the developing nations, such idealistic education systems are far down in the list of priorities.
Fritzie Reisner 100+
Gabriella Araimo
I'm a student and every day I see my classmates losing enthusiasm and interest in learning. What society are we going to build with these apathetic men? What progress will have our economy if we continue to escape from study, work and research? I think nations will pay a lot for this in the long term.
I'm aware of the current crisis and I don't hope that this kind of education systems are first place in priorites. But maybe governments will change their mind after proving its positive results. So, how to find money to start a school like this and demonstrate that it has only advantages?
junaid ahmad
what is the use of making a school for it
Gabriella Araimo