This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »
Democracy - The most inefficient type of government?
I look at general masses of people, what they do, how they think, how easily they are manipulated, and how clueless they can be. I often wonder how people can be so ignorant! And this got me to think "if the masses are so ignorant and so easy to manipulate, why do they select our leaders?" Well this brought me to another point, is democracy really an efficient form of government if its people are ignorant?
We are prisoners of democracy. If you are on the opposing view of the masses and unable to convince the needed majority, then you effectively have no say, even if you are correct.
This wouldn't be a problem except that it seems that people, now more than ever, are suckers of propaganda, rumors, and biased news. If the masses don't understand what they are voting for and are so easily swayed, how can we still consider democracy a superior system of government?
Lorenzo Ciacciavicca
If we are three people and we want to decide where to go out in the evening and two of us want to go to the cinema, you don't want - but you have to do it because we are the majority and we decide. If tomorrow evening and two of us want to go to a concert, you don't want - but you have to because we are the majority and we decide. If later on we want to eat a pizza and you don't want - you have to because we are the majority and we decide.
If we go along like this what do you do? If we are the majority - in the case you are always on the wrong side - you will never choose. So, you isolate yourself? You can, yes. But this way we're not together anymore and you are alone. Maybe we can decide to follow you? It's not happening like this if we are the majority.
Joshua Kloppers
so
democracy does not pick the "best" leader but it does pick the most ppowerful
and its very efficient at it
Maria Victoria S
Human kind has this desperate need of being all together, to be equals. Sad but true I guess, it won't happen. In order for the world to be considered as global, as one; inequality must be present and democracy must fail.
Lejan . 30+
Jarred Figlar-Barnes
However, all forms of government can be made more efficient including democracy. Power can be shared, money interests can be excluded, with exceptional difficulty though. Religion should stay in its place, not trying to influence policies or governments. So lets stop talking about why and which forms of government are bad or do not work rather lets start a discussion on how to improve the ones we have.
Allan Macdougall 30+
The only way to get close to any form of democracy, is to decentralise government as far as it takes for it to represent localised and unique characteristics, culture, political views and landscape type.
Local people deciding on their own affairs is far more likely to be democratic than any faceless bureaucratic representative from central government imposing inappropriate, standardised policies on regions that are loath to find even remotely helpful.
Anonymous User
Krisztián Pintér 200+
and it is bad because ...?
Anonymous User
Krisztián Pintér 200+
Allan Macdougall 30+
I think the idea of a 'unified country' might be an illusory pipedream, if people and unique communities are to retain some sense of autonomy at the same time. Unification in the truest sense can only be achieved under some kind of dictatorship - either despotic or benevolent, and since benevolence is not known to coexist within a dictatorship, the result will always be oppression of some kind.
Central authorities cannot cope with diversity; the more remote that central authority is from places of such diversity, the less democratic they will be.
On the other hand, leaders of smaller communities would have a visible 'face' and a local presence, and would therefore be very answerable to the people who voted for them. Democracy would naturally follow, and would be cognisant of the particular community's diverse, autonomous character.
I don't think there's anything wrong with a bunch of small cities and towns. With the inevitable depletion of fossil fuels, it's likely to head that way anyway.
George QT
You are right, masses are often ignorant, easily driven and dumb, but democracy grants anyone the right to get out and stand up (if most people don't use it, that's another story). This simple fact, I think, is what balances the equation, and makes the big difference with other methods of government. On a monarchy or a dictatorship (socialism is a dictatorship by definition) if you were born as part of the mass you will die being part of the mass, you simply don't have the right to scale in the social fabric. So I stay with democracy with all its faults.
greg dahlen 20+
If the majority chooses a leader I don't like, it doesn't bother me too, too much because I know I can go on fighting. Every time the leader introduces a new policy I don't agree with I can fight him/her on that policy.
I was introduced to a really cool form of decision-making in Columbae House at Stanford called consensus decision-making. Consensus decision-making means that when the house has to make a decision, they keep dialogue-ing about it until every member of the group, in the case of the house sixty people, agrees with the final decision. Sometimes the process takes a long time, often it goes very quickly.
edward long 100+
Anonymous User
Zman Kietilipooskie
edward long 100+
Gail . 50+
With socialism, big (expensive) toys must be shared no matter who owned them, but small toys (dolls etc) were private property. Again the law suits began and it didn't take long for me to again be called in as judge. I judged socialism to be a failure, and I instituted communism. All toys can be played by all.
that didn't work. Fights were renewed. I was again called in and I judged communism to be unworkable. I instituted a benign monarchy. I would take input, but the final decision was mine. This didn't help much. So I said that the benign monarchy was dead and I was now a dictator.
The funny thing about this is that the kids LOVED it. They were no longer responsible for their own actions & consequences. As much as they liked it, I hated it. I was busy every minute resolving disputes. Something had to be done. Then I had an idea.
Each day while waiting for parents, we played round robin Donkey Kong. There are rules for winning at the game. Stay relaxed. Look at the big picture. Your'e not competing agaiinst a partner, but with yourself. Don't be afraid of the bombs. While calm, decide on your next move.
We instituted a Donkey Kong government (rational anarchy) and ALL arguments immediately ended. When a child felt unhappy, she went to a list of things she liked to do and did them in an effort to remember how to be happy.
Kids loved it. Moms talked of great changes in kids. I loved 2
Anonymous User
It seems as though each governing style has a flaw and that flaw always proves to be a huge flaw. We talk about the superiority of choice and the power of the people in democracy but it is really the wealthy and well-spoken that hold all of the power in almost every case of government. The only difference is, in democracy they have to control the masses in other forms of government they have more direct control (dictatorship, monarchy, communism, etc.)
Ken brown 30+
So the States needs Sulla the Proscriber?
There is Sweden.
Salim Solaiman 50+
Alternatively came up with question below
What you think about if everyone thinks something is right /good to do but the Tyrranic Monarch / Military Dictator forcefully execute what s/he wanted to do?
Agree with you what you said about so called NEWs....I don't see any news in mainstream media....only propaganda or rumour as you said it correctly
pat gilbert 50+
The U.S. is a Republic not a democracy.
The most efficient form of government would be a monarchy.
Anonymous User
Also, "absolute power corrupts absolutely" and it is my personal belief that, generally, over time, governments ruled by one person become less an less efficient and power until a new change of leadership.
pat gilbert 50+
edward long 100+
Anonymous User
I don't believe I stated that monarchy or dictatorship were any better than democracies soling this problem. I was more referring to how people consider democracy sucks. Great system when in fact there seem to be a few flaws in it. However, I and other have yet to come up with a better solution.