TED Conversations

richard moody jr

TEDCRED 10+

This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »

Is natural gas really a good alternative to coal to slow global warming?

Two major arguments justify a massive increase in natural gas production in the US. 1) It allows us to become energy independent, 2) It only produces half the greenhouse gasses of burning coal. The first argument has merit; the second argument is clearly open to debate.

What proponents of hydraulic fracturing (fracking) only consider is the actual burning of the natural gas to produce CO2. What they ignore is that methane, natural gas, is somewhere between 25-75 times as efficient as a global warming gas compared to CO2.

The reason that this is important is that we do not get 100% efficiency in the extraction, transportation, storage and consumption of natural gas---some is lost in each step of the process. In a peer-reviewed article in Climate Change Letters, Robert Howath, Renee Santoro and Tony Ingraffea have assessed the global warming footprint of fracked gas. What they report is that, “Our analysis of methane losses from the shale gas life cycle is based in part on a November 2010 report from the Environmental Protection Agency…and concludes that emissions---particularly for shale gas---are larger than previously believed.” Their paper indicates when you convert methane to its CO2 equivalent that fracking actually increases global warming compared to burning coal.

An October 2012 website article called, “Methane Emissions from Modern Gas Development,” the article states, “Petron et al., 2012, provided the first measured fluxes from an unconventional gas field---at the landscape scale and reported a “best estimate of 4%” (range of 2.3% to 7.7%) from production and processing streams.”

“Wigley (2011) uses climate modeling to assess the impact of transitioning to 50% natural gas power generation by 2050 over a range of emission scenarios (0% to 10%). For all emission scenarios, the switch to natural gas increases warming over the next 20 years. Recent climate modeling has marked these next 20 years as critical to climate mitigation."

0
Share:
progress indicator
  • thumb

    Gail . 50+

    • +1
    Dec 20 2012: When fracking comes to YOUR neighborhood, destroys your aquifers, and turns your faucet into a blow torch, you may not be so supportive of the idea.
    • thumb
      Dec 21 2012: Have you seen the documentary "Gasland". It is all about fracking, a real eye opener.
  • thumb
    Dec 21 2012: I don't like using natural gas OR coal. I know it's possible to create a biofuel using corn, and even better by using algea. I wish that there was more being done in creating an alternative energy. Either way we are destroying our environment by using both natural gas and coal.

    http://www.thefuelfilm.com/ that is the link to a website for a film that talks about creating an alternative biofuel, and it also talks about what we are doing to ourselves today.

    The human race may someday end but the world would flourish without us. We shouldn't say "save the planet" but instead "save the human race". We are slowly killing ourselves.