- Sam Largaespada
- Minneapolis, MN
- United States
This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »
I believe life proves gods existence.
The natural way of the universe is entropy. However life as we know it is only getting more and more complex and ordered. This would seem to go against the notion of entropy. I like to think that god has something to do with instilling a sense of order in a chaotic universe.
Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.
Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.













Matthieu Miossec 100+
Younus Ali
I hope you do have a belief in good and evil?
Cheers
Matthieu Miossec 100+
Younus Ali
Vasil Rangelov 50+
1) "Science is the name of research nothing more."
From Wikipedia on Science
"Science (from the Latin scientia, meaning "knowledge") is an enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the world."
Keyword is "testable". If something is not testable, it's not science, but mere speculation.
And on Research
"Research can be defined as the search for knowledge, or as any systematic investigation, with an open mind, to establish novel facts, usually using a scientific method."
Keyword is "search". (Re)search is what scientists do before coming up with testable explanations.
2) "Science is not beyond nature's behaviour i.e. fully awared of. There are many other phenomenons that can not still be proven by science."
Yet.
If we allowed any unprovable concept to keep us hostage, humanity would've never found out that the earth is round, among many other things.
3) "We are living in 3D world right now and when we die, our spirits leave this body and goes to 4D."
Actually, we EXIST in a 3D world and LIVE in a 4D world, where the 4th dimension is time.
Compare a picture of a rectangle with that of a cube with the same sized side, looked directly at one side. The 3rd dimension is still there, but you don't perceive it because you're looking at this one side. In the same way, time is still in the world, though we can't visually perceive it, but just experience it.
I'm willing to accept the possibility of there being additional dimensions to our universe, but they'll be in the same universe, not a separate afterlife universe.
4) "I hope you do have a belief in good and evil?"
I don't believe in good and evil. I KNOW good and evil. I know all life has the capacity to do good or evil. We all have brains that have neuron activity that could lead in either direction.
Younus Ali
i would like to make it more simple now...
1 & 2) If we had to believe on wikipedia and stuffs before coming up with our views, then why would we even bother to speak our minds here? Can you prove why does Modern Medical Science is still not awared 10% of the reasons of being impotent?? Why 70% of world is of water, same as our body consists the same proportion?? Why still science is not capable of producing Magnet??
3 & 4) Infact there are found to be more than 11 dimensions, can you explain from you own poin of views, but not from wikipedia's search...What does it take to diff in doing good and bad without coming up with outcomes? Why still we insist in doing good then??
Vasil Rangelov 50+
There is a difference between facts and opinions. A fact is something that can be confirmed to be true, whereas an opinion is something that can't be. A person's "views" are his opinions. They don't include "facts" by definition. "Facts" are instead part of a person's "knowledge", and can often be used as a basis for forming "views" on non-yet-proven issues.
You can't have an opinion on whether the earth is flat or round - it's a fact that the earth is round. If you strive to be an astronaut, you could see it for yourself (i.e. this is provable), but until then, video footages will have to serve as proof for you and me alike.
We're speaking our minds here to put out our opinions, learn/teach facts and opinions, reshape our views, repeat.
2) "Infact there are found to be more than 11 dimensions"
Those 11 dimensions are currently only mathematically proven. Science hasn't yet figured out if/how each one of those dimensions, beyond the 4th, fits into our universe, because no scientist has yet come up with a physical test that someone can perform to see this. But again, even if they do, that's still our universe, not a separate universe.
3) "Can you prove why does Modern Medical Science is still not awared 10% of the reasons of being impotent??"
And you're saying (again without proof) modern medical science became aware of 90% because God/religion changed its mind and decided the world needs to know? Facts suggest otherwise - that those 90% were found by scientists instead. It's only a matter of time before the other 10% are found, same way as the 90% were once 0%.
4) "Why 70% of world is of water, same as our body consists the same proportion??"
Maybe because the universe is actually behaving in a predictable way regardless of scale - like a fractal.
5) "Why still science is not capable of producing Magnet??"
Floppy disks?
Matthieu Miossec 100+
Younus Ali
@ Matthieu - Same reply for you, fridge works because of magnet, but is not a source to PRODUCE it :)
Younus Ali
Younus Ali
I have studied water in depth and still learning about it and the more i come to know it, the more curious it makes me
Vasil Rangelov 50+
"Water is itself a mystry brother, there are many other factors as to why universe behaves in such pattern."
Exactly the reason God is not it. There are MANY factors. Using a being that made it that way is over simplification that doesn't map to the truth. You said you've studied water in depth... have you found any evidence of there being God involved in its creation? Any test that we may do in a certain environment which would suggest that water has a free will, therefore has some sort of an energy or matter that has will, therefore "god" per your earlier definition?
"Floopy disk doesn't produce magnet, instead every electronics is made up of magnet. Again magnet can not be produced :)"
I'm not sure I follow... for something to be made up of a magnet, doesn't that magnet have to first be produced, and therefore, aren't we able to produce magnets?
"Earth is not found to be round, but an egg shaped :)"
I didn't say "sphere", I said "round", and an "egg" is a kind of a round shape. Last time I checked, earth isn't exactly an egg either, but more like "rounded egg-like" shape... but that's just semantics anyway. Point was that it's not what religions want you to "believe" without evidence.
Younus Ali
Furthermore, here is the link i would like you to watch,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Y2Or0LlO6g
Matthieu Miossec 100+
Younus Ali
I am justifying the unkonwns to you Matthieu. You need to know to broaden your views and correct them by yourself being understood of the history, not self knowledge.
Matthieu Miossec 100+
Younus Ali
great minds discuss ideas, mediocers discuss events and ordinary minds discuss people!!
Hope you come out of this discussion with some new idea dude :)
Younus Ali
Matthieu Miossec 100+
Way to go on avoiding the question Younus...
Also who are you to judge the quality of my mind? Speak for yourself.
Younus Ali
I just did that, and remained the arguments to know rather than arguments for sake of arguments Matthieu.
I can't make a judgement on any person unless I know the person in personal capacity :)
That is why i discuss ideas, not people.
Cheers
Vasil Rangelov 50+
That's different from your definition, but regardless... there's no evidence for either being's existence. There may be things in it that don't contradict with science, but so there are in any science-fiction art work. That doesn't make the false parts of science-fiction works true, the same the true parts of a holy book (Bible and Quran alike) don't make the false parts true.
Younus Ali
Please go through this link brother, i hope it will clear the misconceptions :)
Cheers
Matthieu Miossec 100+
Younus Ali
Peace
Vasil Rangelov 50+
The only thing the link you gave cleared up was that Yahweh is not the name of the Christian God, but a title, and that Allah is a name... fine... I accept that... you still haven't answered my question, which has nothing to do with that.
The question was about the definition of God/The LORD/Yahweh/Al-Rab (allegedly named Allah or an unpronounceable Hebrew word) being different from your definition, and if you have any evidence supporting the existence of either being, having studied water more deeply than (I'd guess) most of us here.
I'm guessing you don't have any evidence for God in any definition, but instead have evidence supporting many other (read: not divine) factors' influence on the universe.
Younus Ali
I have no words to define Him.
In every thing of nature, you'll find His supermacy and love. I hope it clears the small questions...
Vasil Rangelov 50+
If that's true, then all holy books must be wrong. They are written in human languages, they define God and we can't define that supreme power in any human language, therefore holy books are wrong. Would you agree? If not, this can only mean that the supreme power is definable, as is done by [whichever holy book one finds to be true (Quran in your case)].
"In every thing of nature, you'll find His supermacy and love."
Including planet wiping supernovas, brain eating Blue-footed Boobies, genocide-striking human deceases, [insert other bad things in the universe]?
Sam Largaespada
Matthieu Miossec 100+
Sam Largaespada
Matthieu Miossec 100+