TED Conversations

This conversation is closed.

Daily elections which will force politicians to work better

In India, we see politicians at the time of elections and helping people, working for people only to win elections. So if there is an election daily then they will help people and do their work daily. So I propose a system where people vote for a candidate and can change their vote any time by logging into site. This implies someone will be voting for the candidate or party somewhere daily. Just like shares, who ever got the highest shares will own the company.
When a party has reached its lower limit of voting and stays below that limit for more than a month then we can consider that people are against that party and the government needs to be changed and the party which is in majority will form the new government. Yes it has many challenges like to maintain secrecy of the vote, saving the site from hackers and many others. But the advantages will surely overcome the disadvantages.
Advantages will be
Government will have to work correctly for the benefit of the people if they don't they will be taken away from the seat not after 5 years but by next month.
If people don't like any bill they can fail that bill and make the bill get rejected.
Corruption will be ended easily.
Remember the Jan Lokpal bill and many Indians who supported Anna hazare. Decision on these type of bills will be taken faster as Government will know that if they don't do it people will take away their crown.
No politician will think that there are 5 years left for the election so lets do all the scamps now and lets show off as we they are working for the last 1 year and win the election again.
We have many standard laws which can make India a corruption free country but the politicians don't want that to happen which will make their financial benefits go down, so by implementing this idea we can force politicians to wipe out corruption.
I know this idea needs many changes but this is just an idea for a betterment, not a constitutional rule which has to be flawless.Even they have some flaws:)


Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

  • thumb
    Dec 7 2012: Good idea.
    However, sometimes the success of long-term projects are not immediately visible and this could lead to unfair assessment of a really deserving leader.
    The attempt to sustain popular vote may lead to cosmetic projects and quick fixes.
    • Dec 8 2012: Yes, This may lead to unfair assessment of deserving leaders, but those leaders should also think of some short term plans which should show results to people. Not every time we would be happy with the good things going to happen only for our future generations. There should be something which will also make our current life happy. If there is a project which will have a long term success then he should convince people about the advantages of the project. But I have to say you have made a very valid point.

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.