TED Conversations

This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »

Is section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 still justified by current needs?

The Supreme Court recently granted certiorari in the case of Shelby County v Holder. Section 5 prohibits certain “covered jurisdictions” from making any change in their voting procedures without first demonstrating to either the Attorney General or a three-judge district court in Washington that the change “neither has the purpose nor will have the effect of denying or abridging the right to vote on account of race or color.”

0
Share:

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

  • Nov 14 2012: What do you believe? Tell this to Congress. They have felt it was until fairly recently.

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.