TED Conversations

Marlon Jones

Gear Up Liaison, Oklahoma Regents for Higher Education: GEAR UP

This conversation is closed.

"...but I'll defend to the death your right to say it… Really?"

Voltaire once said “I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it” Would I? Really? While maybe not dead, civility is definitely paralyzed in our country, in our communities, and in our homes. At what point did it become easier to antagonize, patronize, and vilify the “other” instead of conducting a reasoned discussion about the perplexing issues that surround us? Well into the machinations of the most recent elections it was being reported by various media sources that Americans were more divided than during any other time in history. There is simply something that does not sound quite right about that statement. Is it possible to have an honest and reasoned discussion? Is it possible to objectively consider an opposing point of view? Do we even agree on what the problems are? Disagreements are inevitable but being disagreeable is not. What do you think?

Share:

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

  • thumb
    Nov 20 2012: Re: "Is it possible to objectively consider an opposing point of view?"

    According to Carl Popper, when a scientist wants to prove his theory, he must actively seek to disprove it, actively search for contradicting evidence. When such search is diligent, but only yields supporting evidence, the theory is accepted.

    It is not only possible, but it is necessary for everyone to consider the opposing views.

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.