- Jean-Charles Longuet
- Lille
- France
This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »
Telling the truth: are there limits?
Two recent talks focused on "Truth" as something good/moral. Practically, however, some information may cause havoc: the Wikileaks diplomatic data disclosure, for example, coulad have put some people at risk.
How should we manage the decision to disclose (or not) such information? Or manage the moral dilemma when telling a lie may have a positive outcome?
_____
[update 2012/11/25] The conversation initially mixed a few things : Truth is something that is not as obvious as it seems, and Lies are more related to a deceiving/manipulative intention that to the hiding of some Truth.
Anyway, all points of views are welcome.
Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.
Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.













cyn eden
Lying is never acceptable.
Lying distorts reality and prevents those decieved from making accurate decisions based on sound facts.
In the interest of national security, one must always make a decision based on the assumption that at some point, the facts might/will become public. In which case, will the end justify the means?
If one functions from a position of honesty, one tends to function with a moral compass that ultimately benefits everyone.
Jean-Charles Longuet
Imagine you're hiding someone in your house because they are searched by people wanting to kill them. They knock your door and ask if that person is in your house. Won't you lie ? I suppose you will because your moral compass will balance the consequences of your lie with the positive outcome.
Of course, the example is extreme, but realistic. I am unsure whether or not we can find a "safe path" to find the correct limit about an acceptable lie and an unacceptable one.
cyn eden
I probably wouldn't answer the door. :o
Todd Levesque