TED Conversations

This conversation is closed.

Idea: "Country-in-a-country" special economic zone

The reason for outsourcing is usually cheaper labour costs.But the people who are doing this work are actually having a good quality of life. Because in real terms even though their wages are lower ( eg: in Bengaluru, India) compared to a developed country ( eg:USA), the cost of living is lower as well. At same time jobs are lost in USA. If americans unemployed due to outsourcing can go and work in India they have beter quality of life. But this is always not possible ,due to family commitments , distance etc.

My proposal is special economic zone similar to Charter city , but in reverse. This will be in a developed county ( Say USA). To start with set aside a few thousand hectares of land in say florida for this economic zone - call it CIC ( country in country). It will be a replica of eg: Bengaluru. It will have offices, houses,schools, health care , shopping , entertainment , banks etc. The crucial issue it will have indian rupee as currency. With all these similar to the Indian city , the cost of living and working should be on par with Bengaluru. Now companies can establish call centres in these CIC zones. The pay for call centre operatives will be same as in Bengaluru and paid in indian rupees. So from the company's point of view this call centre on american land costs the same as if it were to be in India.

But the people employed here will be americans who chose to move to this mini India in USA. They have jobs, relatively good earnings as cost of living is less with all amenities. Most people would stay and work in this CIC zone say for one or two years and then move on to jobs in america.
It is bringing american jobs to america while maintaining standard of living and cutting through the barriers of currency exchange rate etc.

It appears to be a win win situation.

But I have a feeling that there must be a fundamental flaw in this idea. I hope somebody who knows these things will be able to point it out.

Topics: economics society

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

  • Comment deleted

    • Nov 11 2012: like European union?
      • thumb
        Nov 11 2012: EU is not a special economic zone unless we mean 'a special economic zone of indolence'.

        For me SEZ means first and foremost low taxes and business friendly regulations, so that entrepreneurs do not waste their time on the unnecessary paperwork.
        • Nov 11 2012: "For me SEZ means first and foremost low taxes and business friendly regulations"

          That's just code for corporate welfare and making a (bigger) profit at the expense of the environment and future generations. Businesses don't need to be pampered as long as they can still afford to give away tens of millions to executives.
      • thumb
        Nov 11 2012: Sorry for accidentaly removing the original statement to which muralikrishna garikipati refers above. The statement was:

        Special Economic Zones should be extended over the whole world.

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.