TED Conversations

Andres Aullet

TEDCRED 10+

This conversation is closed.

Trickle down vs. trickle up

The more businesses are left alone to do what they do best (sell a product or service), free from regulations, external influences and excessive taxation, the better they will be.

Loans and extra profits can be then used for more business creation and business growth, which in return drive more economic prosperity for investors, and that also "trickles down" to workers (as jobs and better salaries) and consumers (as lower prices) and everybody benefits in the end.

Or so the story goes.

Although the theory says that when investors gets richer, they use this extra wealth to promote more businesses, and in the process creating more jobs and driving prices down through specialization; there are many examples where the extra wealth is either just accumulated, or it is invested in ways that do not create jobs nor drive prices down.


Would things work in reverse?

What if individuals rather than businesses were the recipients of loans (micro), left alone to do what they do best (which i contend is creativity), as free from regulations, external influences and excessive taxation as possible.

They would then require raw materials and more people to put their ideas into action, they would need products and services offered by bigger businesses. In the end, everybody would benefit and the economic prosperity would trickle up

Obviously, this is an idealization.

But, could we benefit from a balance of both approaches?

Share:

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

  • thumb
    Nov 3 2012: All boats rise with the tide.
    When I produce a valued commodity that I can exchange for a valued commodity that you've produced we both come out ahead. I can continue producing my specialized commodity for exchange without retooling to produce the commodity I can bargain with from you or others, and then so can you.
    Henry Ford valued a parity of production by producing cars that his workforce can afford. Mr. Ford got rich, his company thrived, and his example of production fueled an engine of economic prosperity.
    • Nov 3 2012: Henry Ford had a motto: "pay your employees enough so that they can buy what they produce", few businesses still work like that.

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.