This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »
Debate: Gold has no real value to the man in the street.
Practical value of gold from a “man in the street” point of view.
For the vast majority of people on this planet gold is worthless.
A bold statement but consider the following.
To live you need money, doesn’t matter what sort as long as it’s the money that is in circulation in your country. With this money you buy, food, housing, energy, transport plus the other essentials needed for life.
If you are in work you will typically get paid your supply of money by your employer. If you are on benefits you get your money from the government and if you are on a pension you get your money from your pension provider. If you are begging on the streets you get your money from charitable sorts who feel kind enough to give you some of their money gained from the first three sources mentioned above. All these sources provide “money” not gold.
Next when you come to spend (or give away) your money the recipient will want, you guessed it, your money. He doesn’t want gold or any other stuff that has a “value” such as silver, lead, pretty crystalline minerals or anything else. He wants your money.
So what are you going to do with your gold. You have 3 options, wear it, store it or exchange it. If you wear it, it has no value to you. OK it has value to someone else, but to you it’s just jewellery. If you store it, it has even less value as you don’t actually derive any personal satisfaction other than telling everyone you are sitting on a pot of gold. If you sell it you typically sell it for money, which you can then use to but everything mentioned above. But you can only do this once.
So, unless you own a factory that makes electronic products or jewellery or are a professional gold trader, gold has no value to the man in the street.














pat gilbert 100+
peter lindsay 30+
W. Ying 10+
Gold is a kind of money with less circulation ability.
Money makes greed --- INVALID HAPPINESS!.
INVALID HAPPINESS makes all kinds of evils, including immoral, crimes, wars and human self-extinction.
Krisztián Pintér 200+
John Smith 30+
John Frum 30+
Wrong. Gold is used in jewelry now BECAUSE it is expensive -- it is a way of showing off, just like Armani suits or Ferraris. Gold is expensive because it is rare, and because its relative chemical inertness keeps it from "aging". The same goes for platinum, silver, or even palladium. Do you think any of those jewelry wearers can tell the difference, just by looking, between platinum and stainless steel? It is fairly easy to make alloys that look like gold too. Or even gemstones, fake or real.
John Smith 30+
Right, but without the speculation gold would definitely be cheaper and jewelry would be made of different materials.
"Gold is expensive because it is rare, and because its relative chemical inertness keeps it from "aging"."
It's also fairly useless, except for electronics, that should depress its price.
John Frum 30+
Don't you think jewelry is useful? The most prized jewelry will always be made of the most expensive (rare and inert) material. If gold did not exist, people would have worn, and speculated with, the next material that has the two key attributes.
Speculation is the way people experiment in any competitive economy. The more reckless the speculation, the greater the risk of losing. This is true whether we're buying Picassos, or designing a strategy for "the next greatest" software user interface. Gold, despite its ups and downs, has proven to be relatively un-reckless.
Gail . 50+
John Frum 30+
This is not how it works. Take the case of two girls (Jane and Mary) who are enemies. Let's say they both think that gold ornaments make them look prettier. Mary gives all her jewelry to Jane, according to you, it would have no value at all to Jane, because (???) Mary gets to look at a prettier girl, but Jane only gets to look at a dull-looking girl. Thus, (???) Jane suffers when she wears it.
I wonder why all the girls I know put lipstick on themselves (though they can't see their own lips) rather than on me!
Feyisayo Anjorin 50+
The 'man in the street' may not think gold is very important if he is starving; but the gold could meet his basic needs if it is sold because we live in the world where gold is valuable.
For the rich (billionnaires in dollars) gold is a more reliable store of value because it can not be destroyed by fire, and it would not rust.
cst commonsense
http://www.commonsensethinking.co.uk/economydream.html
jp
Krisztián Pintér 200+
John Smith 30+
Krisztián Pintér 200+
Lejan . 30+
Just imagine what would happen to our world economy if there was this random gold meteor shower, lasting for 24 hours and leaving this world rich in gold-nuggets which were equally distributed all over the place? :o)
It makes one think how simple we just are... :o)
Barry Palmer 50+