TED Conversations

Bastian Brandt

This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »

Universal monthly allowance for all, financed by a 5% sales tax.

This Monthly Basic Income is also granted to every child that is registered in the region but will be given to their parents until it reaches the age of 18.

It may be granted to them directly, if they use this money to pay their school-fee.

The money to pay for the Monthly Basic Income will come from a purchasing tax of 5% which will be added to the price of all goods and services that are purchased and monthly collected from all business owners.

Due to the fact that richer people buy more goods and services, they will pay the 5% purchasing tax, as well as the 5% of high priced, high quality items more often, than people with less income. This money will support every registered citizen in the region and it will lead to a higher degree of financial equality.
The monthly collected amount from the 5% Purchasing Tax, shall only be used to be given to all citizens of the region as a Monthly Basic Income, that serves as a social and financial safety net for them.

The mathematics behind the Monthly Basic Income is as the following:

Total monthly collected Purchasing Tax :(divided by) The regions population

=(equals) The amount of money that will be granted to every registered citizen of the region as their Monthly Basic Income

I am a big supporter of the idea to implement this Monthly Basic Income, because it represents the principle, that one supports all (the customers that pay the 5% purchasing tax with their every purchase) and all ( the representing officials) are supporting every single citizen of the region.

Topics: economics society
+5
Share:

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

  • Oct 13 2012: in 1972 a social expirement was secretly carried out in a dozen north american cities. it was to determine the membership in the workforce if a guaranteed, assured, basically comfortable amount, and dispensed with ba respect ... they professed wary of premature speculation; but confessed afterward that the majority concensus amongst the involved social scientists was always assumed without question - immediate they defined a major component of the work force to be unhappy and the flight from said employment surely spontaneous with new funding - free; to free them - wonderfully they would relish staying home doing as they please. sadly, although the study was conducted in the 1970's - thought a time of great forced social structural analysis, redefinition, and complete rearrangement of an immensity of such utterly totally conclusive co-factoring variables ... such a massive experimental population base and inclusion of an incomprehensible collection of varied components. yet these supposedly most of wisdom and empathetic perception for society's most unerable, derided and judged, powerless, and held incontemptable - their very patrons, too - as all other citizenry - assigned a very heavily value-laden negativity upon them before they had even known they had any choices yet. the very men awarded doctoral staus in our academic learned and professional classes automatically condemned the poor for being poor, assigned them an extremely acrimoniously judgemental character traits of " ... obvious laziness, unmotivation, any drive, and sheer sloth" - and the only other subgroup condemned just as vitrioically - rarely, the working poor too weredefined with great judgement. the sad fact is that through their stated observations from this experimental data collection ... they themselves personified an even greater social experiment's most glaring conclusion they congruently proved an even uglier and brutally intimate reality of america - everyone despises the poor ...

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.