This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »
Can we change, can we live without money?
Ancient civilisations achieved a great deal, when focusing their efforts upon whichever problem needed to be solved. Energy, water, food etc.
Where previous civilisations failed to meet the needs of their people we now have the opportunity to learn from them and with greater numbers than has ever been on this planet before.
However we have been distracted for generations.
Our efforts are focussed on acquiring, chasing, and losing money, while real issues such as providing fresh drinking water, food, and energy to all humanity are ignored by the majority of us.
The problem with money has become so complex and yet its source energy is greed, and we know this to be destructive in all forms of relationship.
Why would we continue to face the world’s problems using the biggest source of distraction in humanity to get us there?
It is insanity to believe that we need “new world order” and world currency to solve these issues.
A thought:
Imagine everyone today who’s role in human civilisation is to protect and serve money (bankers, accountants, so on and so on) where to be suddenly un-employed.
What figure would that be?
How many working hours would there be available for other more productive tasks in society?
Imagine there is no money. What do we need? How much of it do we need?
Can we meet our needs as a civilisation with the quantities we require vs the amount of time and human energy we have?
Can we stand as ONE to achieve this?
There are more questions, there are more problems, change is coming one way or another, and time is running out.
Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.
Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.














Stefan H. Farr
Krisztián Pintér 200+
you see things that way?
Stefan H. Farr
Krisztián Pintér 200+
Stefan H. Farr
You say people are not focusing on material wealth? Everything is about material wealth. People work, cheat, steal, even kill for it. And I am talking literally not figuratively.
On my last trip to Budapest, I happened to sit on the tram exactly where the ticket puncher was positioned. A person climbed on the next stop and positioned himself closely to the puncher. I found him to be uncomfortably close to me so I couldn't help but look at his actions. From the way he was holding a ticket in his hand that he was not going to punch it, unless the controllers climbed aboard. This would not be so interesting to this topic, but then his phone rang and he picked out a brand new iPhone from his pocket. Even if I give this guy the benefit of the doubt and say that the poor guy is hitching a free ride because he cannot afford to pay for it, I have to place him in the "poor bastard" category who will spend his last dime to pay for an expensive gadget so that he could present himself as having more than he actually has.
This guy is not alone, the vast majority of people are like that. I am sorry but I have to radically contradict you: their heads might be empty, as in they don't focus on anything, but they sure focus on at least on thing: having more and being able to show it.
Andrey Kurchatoff
But can you say something from the name of society?
Can you say we but not be part of it?
I think, the ideas your are presenting here is coming from your experiences and and people you see around you. I do think you should say people or perssonally instead of we.
Best wishes,
Andrey
Krisztián Pintér 200+
as you probably aware, i'm kind of well informed about the situation in budapest. so i can also inform you that it is much more a cultural issue than material. the same people are very happy to pay one euro for a farting app for their iphone, approx the same sum as a ticket. not buying a ticket is basically a form of defiance, a personal revolution against the powers that be. so in fact it is a nonmaterial thing, and you should be proud of it.
but if people are so much material, how do you explain the success of kiva, for example?