TED Conversations

Casey Christofaris

Owner, CS3 Inc


This conversation is closed. Start a new conversation
or join one »

Is our math wrong? Is it our assumption of zero, or absolute nothingness?

There are know phenomena out there such as the gamma ray burst that total destroys(use loosely your ego wants to argue this syntax error not the mind) our current math and physics(e=mc2). But instead of saying well maybe we got a key part of our math wrong we make it so the phenomena matches our math. This is my personal take on what I think might be wrong. I think it has to do with our assumption of zero. Seeing how you can never have absolute nothingness as a base or starting point. Conceptually the idea of zero is great. I want an apple. But i am in a complete void of apples. I don't have a single one. Not even applesauce! I have ZERO apples. But I do not need to know that you have zero apples to know when you have 1 apple. On the other had I do need to know that you have 1 apple to understand that now you have 2 apple. I could be wrong. It just something that bothers me.

Also I am not a math person it has always been something I struggled with in school those pesky numbers. However in College I excelled at Logic, but that has been some time ago.

I am not say this is the answer I just say that I think there is something fundamentally wrong with our math


Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.

  • thumb
    Oct 4 2012: Mathematics is a set of logical systems.

    Most of the systems start with a few axioms, and all the rest is derived from it.

    When you apply a kind mathematics to reality, it often works great. Sometimes the chosen set of (mathematical) rules does not apply or cannot answer the question pertaining reality you are asking.

    Math as such is not "right" or "wrong". But you can try and find inconsistencies with certain forms of math and reality.
    • thumb
      Oct 4 2012: I never said that math in "reality" is wrong:

      This is more along the lines of reasoning I am trying to use quote is via Mark Meijer said "All reasoning is circular in the end.

      Anyhoo... The point is all numbers and measurements are abstracts, zero included, and abstracts don't actually map onto reality, only onto eachother. It's all self-referential. Representation is itself an abstract notion, there is no such thing in reality.

      Which is why all reasoning is circular, it is self-referential :).

      But whatever. Your argument is basically "zero is useful". I don't think anyone is disputing that. But what is useful and what is true are two entirely different considerations."

      Which is why the only "person we can not see is ourselves". you can see parts of our self but not all of it .

Showing single comment thread. View the full conversation.